conditions of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conditions of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to certain conditions or criteria that must be followed. For example, you could say "The company is offering a new incentive plan, subject to certain conditions of eligibility."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Conditions of life.

The New York Times - Arts

Tells about stark conditions of urban poverty.

The New Yorker

The conditions of the questioning are unclear.

The New York Times

"So could the conditions of people".

The New York Times

— Tropical Cyclone Conditions of Readiness — "4.

The New Yorker

Actually, these are the conditions of Israel.

The New York Times

The conditions of the shoot encouraged indoctrination.

The Guardian - Film

"The conditions of workers should change.

The Guardian

The conditions of the others were unclear.

The Guardian

"We've lived 10 years under conditions of freedom here.

The New York Times

Those were among the conditions of his three-year probation.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "conditions of", ensure clarity by specifying what is being conditioned and the nature of those conditions. For example, "the conditions of the agreement" should clearly outline the specific stipulations.

Common error

Avoid using "conditions of" without specifying what the conditions apply to. Instead of saying "the conditions are strict", specify "the conditions of the loan are strict regarding repayment schedules."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conditions of" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to specify the circumstances, stipulations, or requirements that govern a particular situation or agreement. Ludwig AI indicates its correct usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

22%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Academia

6%

Encyclopedias

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "conditions of" is a grammatically correct and very common prepositional phrase used to specify the circumstances, stipulations, or requirements pertinent to a situation. As highlighted by Ludwig, it maintains a neutral to professional register, finding frequent use in news, science, and formal business contexts. To ensure clarity, it's crucial to specify what is being conditioned. Common errors include vague conditionality. Alternatives include "terms of", "requirements for", and "circumstances of", offering nuanced ways to express related concepts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

terms of

Focuses more on the specific stipulations or provisions within an agreement or situation.

circumstances of

Emphasizes the surrounding facts and events that affect a situation.

requirements for

Highlights the necessary criteria or stipulations that must be met.

prerequisites for

Stresses the necessary conditions that must exist beforehand.

situations involving

Shifts the focus to the broader context or scenarios where something occurs.

state of

Implies the current condition or status of something at a particular time.

environment of

Highlights the surrounding factors and influences that impact something.

framework of

Suggests a structure or set of guidelines that define the boundaries or parameters.

underpinnings of

Emphasizes the fundamental principles or foundations upon which something is based.

criteria for

Directly addresses the standards or benchmarks used for evaluation or selection.

FAQs

How can I use "conditions of" in a sentence?

Use "conditions of" to specify the circumstances, stipulations, or prerequisites that apply to something. For example, "The "conditions of employment" include a mandatory background check".

What are some alternatives to "conditions of"?

Alternatives include phrases like "terms of", "requirements for", or "circumstances of", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "conditions of" or "terms of"?

Both "conditions of" and "terms of" are correct, but "terms of" often refers to a formal agreement or contract, while "conditions of" can apply to broader situations or circumstances.

How does "conditions of" differ from "state of"?

"Conditions of" typically implies stipulations or circumstances, while "state of" refers to the current status or condition of something. For example, "the conditions of the road" vs. "the "state of the economy"".