condemned to bring

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "condemned to bring" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone feels obligated or fated to deliver something, often with a negative connotation. Example: "He felt condemned to bring bad news to his colleagues after the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In Genesis, the consequence of Eve's disobedience is twofold: women are condemned to bring forth children in pain and to yearn for the husbands who dominate them.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Had not God condemned Eve to bring forth children in pain?

The New York Times - Magazine

They said Mr. Barma had effectively condemned to death many of the people brought before him by declaring them witches.

The New York Times

Many culprits brought within our limits have been condemned to suffer death, the punishment due to that atrocious crime.

Yale University

Following a more severe edict the next year, he was brought back to Carthage, tried, and condemned to death.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Juan López de Uralde of the Green group Equo condemned the decision to bring back the wire.

The Guardian

Senior Republicans have condemned his decision to bring back more troops than his military advisors wanted, yet he has also taken flak from his own party for not withdrawing fast enough.

The Guardian

Thereupon proceedings were brought against him on charges of high treason, and after torture he was condemned to death.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Two were condemned to death.

Stanford University

Are they condemned to doom?

Independent

At court, he is condemned to death.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "condemned to bring" when you want to convey a sense of obligation or negative fate associated with delivering or causing something. It adds a dramatic or fateful tone to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "condemned to bring" in situations where a neutral or positive obligation is intended. Its strong negative connotation can be inappropriate in lighter contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "condemned to bring" primarily functions as a verbal phrase expressing a sense of obligation or unfortunate fate. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. The word "condemned" modifies an implied subject, while "to bring" acts as an infinitive phrase.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Science

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "condemned to bring" is grammatically correct and commonly used to express a sense of unavoidable obligation, often with negative implications. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is valid. While its usage spans several contexts, it is most frequently found in News & Media, Academia and Encyclopedias sources. When using this phrase, be mindful of its strong negative connotation and ensure it aligns with the intended tone. Alternatives such as "doomed to deliver" or "fated to provide" may be more appropriate depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

doomed to deliver

Replaces "condemned" with "doomed", emphasizing a sense of inevitable negative fate.

fated to provide

Substitutes "condemned" with "fated", suggesting a predetermined destiny, and "bring" with "provide", which is a more general term.

obliged to present

Replaces "condemned" with "obliged", indicating a sense of duty or requirement, and "bring" with "present", which implies a formal offering.

forced to convey

Substitutes "condemned" with "forced", highlighting a lack of choice, and "bring" with "convey", implying the transmission of something.

destined to impart

Replaces "condemned" with "destined", emphasizing a predetermined course, and "bring" with "impart", suggesting the giving of knowledge or a quality.

required to produce

Substitutes "condemned" with "required", indicating a necessity, and "bring" with "produce", implying the creation or generation of something.

sentenced to bear

Replaces "condemned to bring" with sentenced to bear; the nuance is about enduring something difficult

left to bear

Replaces "condemned to bring" with left to bear; the nuance is about being abandoned to endure a task

destined to cause

Changes the meaning to indicate the inevitability of causing something, rather than delivering it.

compelled to generate

Replaces "condemned" with "compelled", focusing on external pressure, and "bring" with "generate", indicating creation.

FAQs

How can I use "condemned to bring" in a sentence?

You can use "condemned to bring" to express a sense of unfortunate obligation or destiny. For example, "She felt "condemned to bring" bad news to her family."

What are some alternatives to "condemned to bring"?

Alternatives include "doomed to deliver", "fated to provide", or "obliged to present", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "condemned to bring" grammatically correct?

Yes, "condemned to bring" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English grammar rules, where "condemned" acts as a past participle adjective modifying the implied subject, and "to bring" is an infinitive phrase acting as an adverbial modifier, see also Ludwig AI.

What is the difference between "condemned to bring" and "destined to bring"?

"Condemned to bring" implies a negative or unfortunate obligation, while "destined to bring" suggests a predetermined positive or neutral fate. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the negative burden or a sense of inevitable fate.