concurred with

USAGE SUMMARY

'concurred with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express agreement with someone, usually in regards to someone else's opinion or judgement. For example: "I concurred with my friend that we should take the scenic route home."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Obama concurred with Allen's plan.

The Washington Post

I concurred with that diagnosis.

The New York Times - Health

Judge Sullivan concurred with eBay.

The New York Times - Tech

Gilbride concurred with that philosophy.

The New York Times - Sports

The experts concurred with Hurst's report.

The New Yorker

The specialist concurred with the concussion diagnosis.

The New York Times

That was something I concurred with.

The New York Times

Cell proliferation patterns concurred with previous experiments.

Journal of Biomechanics

Republicans concurred with that assessment Tuesday.

The Washington Post

The dean concurred with the committee's findings.

The New York Times - Magazine

Monette's view of Tony concurred with Maupin's.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "concurred with" when you want to emphasize a formal agreement or alignment, especially in professional or academic writing. It adds a layer of authority and precision to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "concurred with" in casual conversations or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "agreed with" or "I agree" are often more appropriate and natural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "concurred with" functions as a verb phrase indicating agreement or alignment with a statement, decision, or opinion. Ludwig examples showcase its usage in various contexts, reinforcing its role in expressing accord.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

32%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "concurred with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to express agreement or alignment, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While it appears frequently in formal contexts such as News & Media and Science, it's advisable to use simpler alternatives like "agreed with" in casual settings. Ludwig examples demonstrate the phrase's function in formally endorsing opinions and assessments. Understanding its appropriate usage ensures clear and effective communication in various professional and academic settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreed with

This is a more common and straightforward synonym, suitable for most contexts where "concurred with" is used.

was in agreement with

This phrase emphasizes the state of agreement, rather than the act of agreeing.

shared the opinion of

This indicates a similarity in viewpoint or belief.

endorsed

Implies active support or approval, going beyond simple agreement.

validated

Suggests that something was proven correct and therefore agreed upon.

subscribed to the view of

Implies agreement with a specific viewpoint or philosophy.

confirmed

Emphasizes the act of verifying or establishing the truth of something, leading to agreement.

recognized the validity of

This phrase acknowledges the legitimacy or correctness of something.

saw eye to eye with

This idiom suggests complete agreement or harmony in opinion.

was of the same mind as

Indicates a shared perspective or understanding.

FAQs

What does "concurred with" mean?

"Concurred with" means to agree with someone or something, often used in formal contexts to indicate alignment in opinion or judgment.

How to use "concurred with" in a sentence?

You can use "concurred with" like this: "The specialist "concurred with" the concussion diagnosis."

What can I say instead of "concurred with"?

You can use alternatives like "agreed with", "was in agreement with", or "shared the opinion of" depending on the context.

Is "concurred with" formal?

Yes, "concurred with" is generally considered a formal way to express agreement, often used in professional, academic, or official contexts.