concurred on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "concurred on" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form is "concurred with" or "concurred in." Example: "The committee concurred with the proposed changes to the policy."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

When I chatted up a table full of gay men about the app, they all concurred on one point: every one of them confessed to having fallen asleep at one point or another after continually pushing the Load More Men button (it adds men in groups of 20 to your screen).

Huffington Post

"Everybody concurred on that one.

The New York Times

So in filing separate lawsuits, the two groups seemed to be suggesting that while they concurred on the lead-paint issue, no one had crossed the ideological divide for good.

The New York Times

Brien concurred on the importance of better public outreach.

The Guardian

Colonel Colwell and Major Reiter — and Mr. Ghailani's civilian lawyers — concurred on the request.

The New York Times

Mr Hague, in Washington initially to prepare with Mrs Clinton for this weekend's NATO summit in Lisbon, concurred on the importance of saving the peace talks.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

The early Muslims did not immediately concur on what constituted their Sunnah.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But blocs will and must emerge for democracy to work, and the blocs of power in Egypt will not easily concur on what is to be done to end corruption, to launch democracy, to steer Egypt towards openness and modernization.

Huffington Post

Euro RSCG chairman Bob Schmetterer concurs on one level.

Forbes

"Although figures vary widely with regard to drone attack estimates, all studies concur on one important point: there has been a dramatic increase in their use over the past three years," Heyns said.

Huffington Post

Jonathan and I concur on every detail but one.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision in formal writing, replace "concurred on" with "concurred with" or "agreed on". For example, use "The committee agreed on the budget" instead of "The committee concurred on the budget".

Common error

Avoid using "concurred on" as it is grammatically incorrect. Opt for "concurred with" or "agreed on" to ensure your writing is accurate and professional.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "concurred on" functions as a verb phrase, aiming to express agreement or alignment. However, Ludwig AI notes it's not considered standard English. The correct forms are typically "concurred with" or "concurred in".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

36%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "concurred on" is frequently encountered, but Ludwig AI highlights its grammatical incorrectness. The correct forms are "concurred with" or "concurred in." Analysis of its usage indicates it appears across diverse contexts, notably in news and scientific domains. When writing, aim for precision by choosing grammatically sound alternatives like "agreed on" or "reached a consensus on" to maintain clarity and credibility. Despite its common occurrence, using the correct alternatives will ensure accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreed upon

This phrase directly replaces 'concurred' with 'agreed', focusing on the result of reaching an understanding.

settled on

Emphasizes the definitive decision made after considering options, similar to reaching an agreement.

came to an agreement on

More verbose, it stresses the process and the outcome of reaching a mutual understanding.

reached a consensus on

Highlights that the agreement involved multiple parties and a general alignment of views.

were of one mind on

Expresses a strong sense of unity and shared perspective regarding the subject at hand.

were in accord on

A formal way of saying they agreed, suggesting a harmonious alignment of views.

saw eye to eye on

An idiomatic way to describe complete agreement on a matter.

found common ground on

Focuses on discovering shared beliefs or opinions, leading to an agreement.

aligned on

Highlights that different entities or viewpoints have been brought into agreement or parallel direction.

united in

Emphasizes the joining together of different entities or viewpoints for a common purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "concur" correctly in a sentence?

Use "concur" with "with" to indicate agreement with a statement or person (e.g., "I concur with your assessment"). Alternatively, use "concur in" to agree with a decision or action (e.g., "The board concurred in the proposal"). You can also use alternatives such as "agree" or "assent".

What's a more formal alternative to "agreed on"?

While "agreed on" is perfectly acceptable, you can use more formal alternatives like "concurred with", "assented to", or "acquiesced to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "concurred on" ever correct?

While you may find instances of "concurred on", it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use "concurred with" or "agreed on" for clarity and correctness.

What's the difference between "concur with" and "agree with"?

Both phrases indicate agreement, but "concur with" is generally more formal than "agree with". They can often be used interchangeably, but "concur with" lends a more professional or authoritative tone.