concern was groundless

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "concern was groundless" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular worry or fear has no basis in reality or is unfounded. Example: "After reviewing the evidence, it became clear that the concern was groundless and there was no reason for alarm."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Mr Zedillo promised to let me have full details to prove to me that our concern was groundless.

EU Parlament

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

"This concern is groundless," the report says.

The New York Times

Mr. Newman said such concerns were groundless.

The New York Times

Consultancies say such concerns are groundless, but critics note that auditors said the same thing when they were pitching consulting services to audit clients.

The Economist

Again, my concerns were groundless; the illustrator Loren Long has helped to make it a real picture book where the pictures sometimes tell us more than the words.

The Guardian

Conservatives around Mr. McCain counter that the other side's concerns are groundless because Mr. McCain is hardly an empty vessel who might succumb to the views of one group or another.

The New York Times

Timber industry officials said that the concerns are groundless and that most logging was being conducted with an eye to the future health not only of the forests but of the industry.

The New York Times

Cataphora's analysis helped to prove that the allegation was groundless.

The Economist

This insinuation was groundless and shameless, but it paid off, in a fashion.

The New York Times

Asked about that claim, Moore told the Sun Sentinel it was groundless.

Huffington Post

But the guidelines were revised after better research showed these concerns to be groundless with currently marketed IUDs if proper precautions are taken when they are inserted.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "concern was groundless", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific concern is being dismissed or proven to be without basis. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "concern was groundless" when the evidence is merely suggestive or incomplete. Reserve it for situations where the evidence definitively refutes the initial worry.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "concern was groundless" functions as a declarative statement, asserting that a specific worry or apprehension lacks a valid foundation. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "concern was groundless" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to indicate that a particular worry or fear is without basis. Ludwig AI confirms its validity for use in written English. With a neutral tone suitable for various contexts, it appears most frequently in news and scientific publications. Alternatives such as "fear was unfounded" or "worry was baseless" can be used to convey a similar meaning. It's important to ensure the context clearly defines the dismissed concern to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fear was unfounded

Replaces "concern" with "fear" and "groundless" with "unfounded", slightly altering the emotional intensity.

worry was baseless

Substitutes "concern" with "worry" and "groundless" with "baseless", providing a more informal tone.

apprehension was unwarranted

Replaces "concern" with "apprehension" and "groundless" with "unwarranted", resulting in a more formal and cautious expression.

alarm was unjustified

Changes "concern" to "alarm" and "groundless" to "unjustified", suggesting a stronger sense of urgency that proves to be unnecessary.

suspicion was misplaced

Replaces "concern" with "suspicion" and "groundless" with "misplaced", indicating that the initial doubt was not properly directed.

anxiety was needless

Substitutes "concern" with "anxiety" and "groundless" with "needless", emphasizing the unnecessary nature of the worry.

reservation was unsubstantiated

Replaces "concern" with "reservation" and "groundless" with "unsubstantiated", suggesting that the hesitation lacked supporting evidence.

hesitation was without foundation

Replaces "concern" with "hesitation" and "groundless" with "without foundation", indicating a lack of solid basis for the initial doubt.

misgiving was unsupported

Substitutes "concern" with "misgiving" and "groundless" with "unsupported", highlighting the absence of evidence to back up the initial unease.

unease was unconfirmed

Replaces "concern" with "unease" and "groundless" with "unconfirmed", suggesting that the initial discomfort was never verified.

FAQs

How can I use "concern was groundless" in a sentence?

You can use "concern was groundless" to express that a particular worry or fear has no basis in reality. For example, "After reviewing the data, the scientists concluded that the "concern was groundless"."

What's a more formal way to say "concern was groundless"?

A more formal alternative to "concern was groundless" would be "apprehension was unwarranted", which conveys a similar meaning but with a heightened level of formality.

Is it always appropriate to say "concern was groundless"?

It's most appropriate to use "concern was groundless" when there is clear evidence or a logical basis for dismissing the initial worry. Avoid using it when the situation is still uncertain or ambiguous.

Which is more accurate, "concern was groundless" or "concern was unfounded"?

Both "concern was groundless" and "concern was unfounded" are accurate and can be used interchangeably. The choice often depends on personal preference or the specific tone you want to convey.