compromised objectivity

USAGE SUMMARY

"compromised objectivity" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used when discussing situations where an individual or entity's ability to remain impartial or unbiased has been compromised. Example: The journalist's compromised objectivity was evident in their article, which heavily favored one political party over the other. Here, the phrase "compromised objectivity" suggests that the journalist's personal biases or outside influences may have influenced their reporting, causing them to present information in a less objective manner.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

But the professors' findings are hard to square with the notion that compromised objectivity is the rule on Wall Street.

The New York Times

The rule also requires audit committees of corporate boards to review their companies' consulting contracts and permits the S.E.C.'s enforcement staff to bring cases based on the appearance of conflict of interest rather than proof of compromised objectivity.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Conventional wisdom holds that getting so close to employees can compromise objectivity and the ability to make tough management decisions.

The New Yorker

On the conventional wisdom that getting close to employees can compromise objectivity and the ability to make tough management decisions: "I dramatically disagree with that.

The New Yorker

Aside from this bias, which can compromise objectivity in any undertaking, science itself has shown through quantum mechanics that the observer invariably influences that which is being observed.

Huffington Post

I never felt that his emotions got in the way of the story or compromised its objectivity.

The New York Times

However, some of Hunt's comments about the proposed deal, Rupert Murdoch, and Sky have prompted Denham to question whether he, like Cable, has compromised his objectivity.

The Guardian

The only reference suggesting he may have made calls to influence games was a sentence in the affidavit saying, "Donaghy also compromised his objectivity as a referee because of his personal financial interest in the outcome of N.B.A. games".

The New York Times - Sports

NBC executives, who had earlier defended his appearance on Iraqi state television, said Mr. Arnett, 68, had compromised his objectivity when he told an Iraqi interviewer that the coalition battle plan had failed.

The New York Times

Recent studies reveal some of how drug company money has compromised the objectivity of drug research.

Huffington Post

Does working towards such specific goals compromise objectivity, leading to similar accusations as those levelled against industry-sponsored scientists?

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing potential conflicts of interest, use "compromised objectivity" to highlight how these conflicts may affect judgment or reporting. This makes the issue clear and direct.

Common error

Avoid using "compromised objectivity" when there is only a minor influence or a perceived bias without concrete evidence. Instead, consider phrases like "potentially biased" or "influenced perspective" to accurately reflect the situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "compromised objectivity" typically functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or the subject complement. Ludwig confirms its correct usage in describing situations where impartiality is diminished.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "compromised objectivity" is a commonly used phrase to describe situations where impartiality is undermined. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in various contexts, especially in news, science, and formal business settings. Key to its effective use is understanding that it indicates a diminishment of existing objectivity, not its complete absence. Alternatives like "impaired impartiality" or "biased perspective" can offer nuanced distinctions depending on the specific context. When writing, avoid overstating the degree of compromise and ensure the phrase accurately reflects the situation. Sources like The New York Times and The Guardian frequently employ this phrase, underscoring its relevance in professional and journalistic discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compromised fairness

This suggests that fairness has been lessened or damaged.

affected impartiality

This simply states that impartiality has been influenced.

impaired impartiality

This alternative emphasizes the reduction in the ability to be impartial.

tainted neutrality

This conveys that the neutrality has been corrupted or damaged.

questionable impartiality

Raises doubts about the level of impartiality.

biased perspective

This suggests a leaning towards a particular viewpoint, affecting neutrality.

influenced perspective

Highlights that the perspective has been subject to external influence or sway.

skewed judgment

This indicates that the judgment is not balanced or fair.

undermined fairness

Emphasizes that the fairness has been weakened or jeopardized.

lack of impartiality

Highlights the absence of impartiality.

FAQs

How can I use "compromised objectivity" in a sentence?

You can use "compromised objectivity" to describe situations where someone's impartiality is affected, such as "The journalist's report showed "compromised objectivity" due to their personal connections to the subject".

What are some alternatives to "compromised objectivity"?

Some alternatives include "impaired impartiality", "biased perspective", or "affected impartiality", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "compromised objectivity" or "lack of objectivity"?

"Compromised objectivity" suggests that objectivity was present but has been diminished. "Lack of objectivity"/"lack of impartiality" implies it was never there. The better choice depends on the specific context.

What factors might lead to "compromised objectivity"?

Factors like financial incentives, personal relationships, and political affiliations can all lead to "compromised objectivity" in various fields, from journalism to scientific research.