Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
compromised by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "compromised by" is correct and commonly used in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which someone or something is affected, hurt, or hindered adversely by some other force or factor. For example: "The project was compromised by a lack of resources."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
It became compromised by everything else.
News & Media
Does GCHQ feel compromised by this?
News & Media
Neuroscientists examine minds compromised by brain injury.
News & Media
Clattenburg compromised by cautioning the teenager.
News & Media
The arrangement, he admits, was compromised by his own naïveté.
News & Media
Kelsey insisted privacy would not be compromised by the scheme.
News & Media
He had watched raid after raid compromised by corrupt officials.
News & Media
But how to avoid being compromised by the Christian connotations?
News & Media
Has the president's security been compromised by his scooter escapes?
News & Media
Netanyahu himself arrived compromised by personal scandal and political strain.
News & Media
Our war in Afghanistan may be compromised by a bank?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider the specific nuance you want to convey. "Compromised by" often implies a weakening or undermining effect. If you want to emphasize damage, "harmed by" might be a better choice.
Common error
While "compromised by" is generally acceptable, it can sometimes sound overly formal or technical in everyday writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "affected by" or "weakened by" for greater accessibility.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "compromised by" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating that something has been negatively affected or weakened by a specific factor. Ludwig AI confirms this usage, showcasing its prevalence across various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Science
31%
Formal & Business
8%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
1%
Wiki
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "compromised by" is a commonly used and grammatically correct prepositional phrase that indicates something has been negatively affected or weakened by a particular factor. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it serves to explain the cause of a diminished state and is employed across various contexts, with a strong presence in News & Media and Science. While generally neutral in register, opting for alternatives in informal situations, such as affected by or weakened by, can enhance accessibility. When using "compromised by", clarity is key: ensure the compromising factor is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
jeopardized by
This alternative emphasizes the risk or danger introduced by the compromising factor.
undermined by
This alternative suggests a gradual weakening or erosion of something's effectiveness or integrity.
weakened by
This alternative emphasizes the loss of strength or effectiveness due to an external factor.
affected by
This alternative is more general and can refer to any kind of influence, not necessarily negative.
impaired by
This alternative suggests a reduction in functionality or capability.
damaged by
This alternative highlights physical or metaphorical harm inflicted.
harmed by
This alternative focuses specifically on the negative impact or damage caused.
tainted by
This alternative suggests a loss of purity or integrity due to contamination or association with something negative.
marred by
This alternative indicates that something's perfection or beauty has been spoiled.
vitiated by
This alternative implies a corruption or degradation of something's value or quality.
FAQs
How to use "compromised by" in a sentence?
Use "compromised by" to indicate that something has been weakened or negatively affected by a particular factor. For example, "The investigation was "jeopardized by" a leak to the press".
What can I say instead of "compromised by"?
You can use alternatives such as "affected by", "undermined by", or "weakened by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Which is correct, "compromised by" or "compromised because of"?
"Compromised by" is more concise and generally preferred. "Compromised because of" is grammatically correct but can be slightly redundant. For example, "The deal was "jeopardized by" delays" is better than "The deal was jeopardized because of delays".
What's the difference between "compromised by" and "influenced by"?
"Compromised by" typically implies a negative impact or weakening, while "influenced by" simply means affected or shaped, without necessarily carrying a negative connotation. Therefore, "influenced by" is the same as "affected by".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested