comprehensive coverage of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comprehensive coverage of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an in-depth examination of a topic or subject. For example, you might say, "This book provides a comprehensive coverage of 19th-century European history."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Comprehensive coverage of all aspects of chemistry.

Princeton University

And for comprehensive coverage of Wimbledon visit our microsite.

The Guardian - Sport

This multidisciplinary database provides comprehensive coverage of the environmental sciences.

Stanford University

Offers comprehensive coverage of security & counter-terrorism issues.

Princeton University

As a result, it gives the most comprehensive coverage of any of the national papers.

The Guardian

This textbook provides comprehensive coverage of international finance from policy, regulatory, and transactional perspectives.

Harvard University

Provides comprehensive coverage of an international range of English-language periodicals, monographs and yearbooks.

Stanford University

With 5,500 entries, it provides comprehensive coverage of biology, biophysics, and biochemistry.

Stanford University

For comprehensive coverage of her evolution and career, see Christine Lagarde (Extended) (2135.0).

Harvard University

Please consult Hollis+ or Hollis Classic for comprehensive coverage of the library's holdings.

Harvard University

Comprehensive coverage of all examples of a given reaction is provided in tabular form.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for a specific understanding of a topic, use the phrase "comprehensive coverage of" to assure your audience that all pertinent areas will be addressed.

Common error

Avoid using "comprehensive coverage of" if your overview omits key details or perspectives; it can mislead readers and undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comprehensive coverage of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, indicating the extent and thoroughness of the coverage. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a valid and commonly used expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

31%

News & Media

28%

Science

37%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "comprehensive coverage of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to indicate a thorough and in-depth examination of a topic, suitable for diverse contexts ranging from academic writing to news reporting. While alternatives such as "complete coverage of" or "extensive coverage of" exist, "comprehensive coverage of" remains a strong and versatile choice for conveying thoroughness. Remember to avoid overstating the comprehensiveness if all key details are not truly covered.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

complete coverage of

Focuses on the completeness aspect more directly, implying nothing is left out.

all-inclusive coverage of

Indicates that all relevant elements are included, leaving nothing out.

extensive coverage of

Emphasizes the breadth and scope of the coverage.

in-depth coverage of

Highlights the level of detail and analysis provided.

thorough coverage of

Stresses the meticulousness and carefulness of the coverage.

wide-ranging coverage of

Indicates that a large number of topics or aspects are covered.

exhaustive coverage of

Implies that all possible aspects or details are covered.

blanket coverage of

Implies coverage that is widespread and affects everything or everyone.

detailed examination of

Shifts the focus to a close inspection rather than broad coverage.

full account of

Suggests a complete narrative or description of events.

FAQs

How can I use "comprehensive coverage of" in a sentence?

You can use "comprehensive coverage of" to describe a thorough and detailed examination of a topic. For example, "The report provides "comprehensive coverage of" the environmental impact of the new policy".

What are some alternatives to "comprehensive coverage of"?

Some alternatives include "complete coverage of", "extensive coverage of", or "in-depth coverage of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "very comprehensive coverage of"?

While not grammatically incorrect, "very comprehensive coverage of" can be redundant. "Comprehensive" already implies a high degree of thoroughness, so using "very" might not add significant value. Consider using alternatives like "exceptionally detailed coverage" instead.

What's the difference between "comprehensive coverage of" and "detailed analysis of"?

"Comprehensive coverage of" suggests a broad overview of all relevant aspects, while "detailed analysis of" implies a deeper, more focused examination of specific elements. The former prioritizes breadth, the latter, depth.