completely harmless

USAGE SUMMARY

"completely harmless" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to describe something that poses no danger or risk at all. For example, "The substance is considered completely harmless to humans." Alternative expressions include "entirely safe" and "totally innocuous."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Or completely harmless.

The Guardian - Travel

Unlike venomous adders, they're completely harmless.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

But he was completely harmless, fodder for Spy magazine.

The Washington Post

The nature of how this "Bt toxin" operates makes it completely harmless to humans.

Harvard University

The drift is completely harmless if we take the trouble to say what we mean.

Harvard University

Unlike medication, sex toys are completely harmless when used correctly and can be fun.

Independent

"These people are sitting in the camp, completely harmless," he said.

The New York Times

"Apart, they are completely harmless chemicals; together, it's a wonderful cocktail".

The New Yorker

"It's completely harmless at one point and at the next it's a very dangerous trap".

The New York Times - Science

"[Marijuana is] not a completely harmless substance, and there are some risks involved".

The Guardian

Faffing is completely harmless, whereas its opposite - dynamic, purposeful activity - is often very harmful.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing potential interactions or exposures, use "completely harmless" to reassure your audience of the absence of any negative consequences.

Common error

Avoid using "completely harmless" in highly technical or scientific contexts where nuanced risk assessments are required. Instead, provide specific data or qualifications regarding potential risks.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "completely harmless" functions as a compound adjective that modifies a noun, indicating the absence of any harmful properties or effects. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent use in describing the safety or non-threatening nature of a subject.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Wiki

20%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "completely harmless" is a very common and grammatically sound way to describe something that poses no risk or danger. Ludwig AI analysis reveals its widespread use across various contexts, particularly in news, media, and encyclopedic content. While the phrase is generally neutral in tone, it's essential to ensure its accuracy and avoid overuse in technical contexts where more precise risk assessments are needed. Consider alternatives like ""entirely benign"" or ""totally innocuous"" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

entirely benign

Focuses on the positive, non-threatening nature.

totally innocuous

Emphasizes the lack of any harmful effect or intention.

perfectly safe

Highlights the absence of danger or risk.

absolutely safe

Highlights the absence of danger or risk with particular emphasis.

entirely safe

Highlights the absence of danger or risk with particular emphasis.

utterly innocuous

Emphasizes the lack of any harmful effect or intention with particular emphasis.

perfectly innocent

Highlights a lack of guilt or harmful intent.

entirely innocent

Highlights a lack of guilt or harmful intent with particular emphasis.

posing no threat

Focuses on the absence of potential danger.

presenting no danger

Focuses on the absence of current danger.

FAQs

How can I use "completely harmless" in a sentence?

You can use "completely harmless" to describe something that poses no risk or danger. For example, "The new cleaning product is "completely harmless" to the environment."

What are some alternatives to "completely harmless"?

Alternatives include "entirely benign", "totally innocuous", or "perfectly safe" depending on the context.

Is it always accurate to describe something as "completely harmless"?

While "completely harmless" indicates no risk, it's important to ensure the statement is accurate and supported by evidence, especially in fields like medicine or environmental science. Consider if qualifiers are necessary.

What's the difference between "completely harmless" and "relatively safe"?

"Completely harmless" implies zero risk, while "relatively safe" suggests a lower risk compared to something else, but not necessarily the absence of all risk.