completely eradicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "completely eradicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the total removal or elimination of something, often in contexts like disease, pests, or problems. Example: "The disease was completely eradicated from the region after years of vaccination efforts."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Worldwide, polio is close to being completely eradicated, but one final push is necessary to make eradication a reality.

Unicef

The stain has not been completely eradicated.

The Guardian - Sport

But Spanulolo argues that it isn't completely eradicated.

The Guardian - Tech

Over time we anticipate that the virus will be completely eradicated.

The Guardian

Now, every department uses the same system and scope for human error is almost completely eradicated.

The Guardian

But in truth, exactly how the virus was completely eradicated from his system remains a mystery.

The Guardian

Under this policy, glanders was almost completely eradicated in the U.S., Great Britain, and Canada.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The cancerous tissue must be completely eradicated, by either surgery or radiation, to effect a cure.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Despite our best efforts, smallpox remains the only human disease to have been completely eradicated from the planet.

The Guardian

As a direct result of the development of the vaccine, polio was completely eradicated in the US by 1979.

The Guardian

"The practice robs women of their will, objectifies and dehumanises them and must be completely eradicated from Kurdistan".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "completely eradicated", ensure that the context clearly supports the claim of total and irreversible removal. Avoid using it loosely for situations where the removal is only partial or temporary.

Common error

Avoid using "completely eradicated" when the situation involves mere reduction or suppression. Reserve it for scenarios where the removal is absolute and verifiable. For example, if a disease is under control but not gone, using phrases like "significantly reduced" or "brought under control" is more accurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "completely eradicated" functions as a descriptor, typically used to modify a noun. It signifies the total and irreversible removal of something. Ludwig AI's examples demonstrate its use in contexts such as diseases, problems, and populations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

36%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "completely eradicated" is a descriptor that emphasizes total and irreversible removal. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and frequently used, especially in News & Media and Science contexts. While suitable for formal and neutral registers, it should be used judiciously to avoid overstatement. Related phrases include "wholly eradicated" and "entirely eliminated", offering similar meanings. Be sure that the removal is absolute and verifiable to ensure appropriate usage. Its frequency, authoritative sources, and grammatical validity all suggest it is an expressive and reliable phrase to employ.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

wholly eradicated

Replaces "completely" with "wholly", maintaining the sense of total removal.

absolutely eradicated

Replaces "completely" with "absolutely", reinforcing the idea of a definitive end.

entirely eradicated

Substitutes "completely" with "entirely", indicating that nothing remains.

fully eradicated

Uses "fully" instead of "completely", suggesting a state of full or complete eradication.

thoroughly eradicated

Replaces "completely" with "thoroughly", emphasizing the comprehensive nature of the eradication.

completely eliminated

Swaps "eradicated" for "eliminated", a common synonym that stresses removal.

completely wiped out

Replaces "eradicated" with "wiped out", implying a forceful and total destruction.

completely removed

Substitutes "eradicated" with "removed", a simpler term denoting the act of taking away entirely.

totally suppressed

Uses "totally suppressed" instead of "completely eradicated", indicating that something has been prevented from developing or operating.

effectively terminated

Changes "completely eradicated" to "effectively terminated", indicating a conclusive end to something, often a process or project.

FAQs

How can I use "completely eradicated" in a sentence?

You can use "completely eradicated" to describe the total removal of something, such as a disease or a problem. For example, "Smallpox has been "completely eradicated" from the world through vaccination programs."

What are some alternatives to "completely eradicated"?

Some alternatives to "completely eradicated" include "entirely eliminated", "totally removed", or "fully extirpated". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "completely eradicated" in all contexts?

No, it's not always appropriate. "Completely eradicated" should be used when something has been removed entirely and irreversibly. If something is only partially removed or suppressed, other terms are more suitable.

What's the difference between "completely eradicated" and "largely eliminated"?

"Completely eradicated" implies a total and permanent removal, whereas "largely eliminated" suggests that something has been significantly reduced but not entirely removed. The former is a stronger, more definitive statement.