complete contrast

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "complete contrast" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or condition that is entirely different from another, emphasizing the difference between two things. Example: "The two paintings are in complete contrast; one is vibrant and colorful, while the other is dark and monochromatic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Dessau was a complete contrast.

Independent

The extrovert eighth offers a complete contrast.

The Guardian - Music

By complete contrast, DC United have been flying.

The Guardian - Sport

In complete contrast was Jonathan Moore's The Poison Artist (Orion).

The Guardian - Books

A complete contrast comes from Josienne Clarke and Ben Walker.

The Guardian - Music

Les Deux Alpes was a complete contrast to l'Alpe d'Huez.

The New York Times - Travel

For the Spaniards it was a complete contrast of emotions.

Independent

Alexandre Lunsqui's "Shi" (2008) offered a complete contrast.

The New York Times - Arts

And, in complete contrast to her art, the workshop is uncompromisingly cold and tough.

The Guardian - Arts

It is a complete contrast to the buildings constructed after the second world war.

The Guardian - Arts

She had a lofty bearing that stood in complete contrast to the traditionally submissive Mexican actress".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "complete contrast" to clearly emphasize a significant difference between two subjects or ideas. For enhanced impact, ensure the points of comparison are explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "complete contrast" vaguely. Always specify what two elements are in complete contrast to provide context and relevance to your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "complete contrast" functions as a noun phrase, where "complete" modifies the noun "contrast". It is used to emphasize a significant difference between two things, as demonstrated by the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "complete contrast" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that effectively highlights significant differences between two things. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is considered correct and usable in written English. The phrase is most commonly found in News & Media and Science contexts, making it versatile for various descriptive purposes. While not inherently formal, its impact is maximized when used to provide explicit comparisons. For alternatives, consider phrases like "stark contrast" or "total opposite" for similar emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stark contrast

This alternative suggests a sharp and obvious difference.

total opposite

This phrase emphasizes that the two things are entirely dissimilar.

utter dissimilarity

This alternative highlights the lack of resemblance between the items being compared.

absolute divergence

This phrase indicates a complete separation or deviation.

diametrically opposed

This emphasizes the opposition as being direct and complete.

fundamental difference

This focuses on the essential and basic disparities.

marked deviation

This highlights a noticeable departure from a norm or expectation.

polar opposition

This signifies a contrast as extreme as the North and South poles.

sharp distinction

This underscores the clarity and obviousness of the difference.

distinct divergence

This emphasizes both the separation and clarity of difference.

FAQs

How can I use "complete contrast" in a sentence?

Use "complete contrast" to highlight stark differences between two subjects. For example, "The bustling city was in "complete contrast" to the tranquil countryside".

What are some alternatives to "complete contrast"?

You can use alternatives like "stark contrast", "total opposite", or "utter dissimilarity depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "complete contrast"?

While "contrast" inherently implies a difference, adding "complete" emphasizes the extent and degree of that difference, making it a stronger statement. It's not necessarily redundant but serves to amplify the contrast.

What's the difference between "complete contrast" and "slight contrast"?

"Complete contrast" indicates a significant and obvious difference, while "slight contrast" implies only a minor or subtle difference. The choice depends on the actual degree of difference you want to express.