competitors to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "competitors to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing entities or individuals that compete against each other in a particular market or field. Example: "The new product has several competitors to consider in the tech industry."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

Expect eager competitors to pile in.

The Economist

There's distribution, territory and competitors to consider.

The Guardian

They are not direct competitors to Patagonia.

The Guardian - Business

We pushed competitors to do the same.

The New York Times

It also appears to be allowing competitors to gain ground.

The New York Times

That price proved hard for competitors to equal.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

Not to management, not to competitors, not to government.

The Guardian

We found that aggression increased as the competitor-to-resource ratio increased.

Animal Behaviour

Mailbox is the obvious competitor to Inbox.

The Guardian - Tech

FindTheBest is not a direct competitor to Google.

The New York Times

Poynt, a competitor to Where was less full-featured.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "competitors to", clearly define the context of competition to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify the market, industry, or field in which the entities are competing.

Common error

Avoid using "competitors to" without specifying what the competition is for. Clearly state the object or goal that the competitors are vying for to provide clarity and context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "competitors to" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, identifying entities that are in competition with a particular subject. This phrase helps to specify the relationship of rivalry or competition, as illustrated in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "competitors to" is a grammatically correct and usable prepositional phrase that specifies a relationship of rivalry or competition. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for defining the competitive landscape in discussions of business, sports, or other competitive domains. While not extremely common, its usage is well-established in news, science, and business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly define the context of competition. Alternatives include "rivals of" and "challengers to", though these alternatives can change the meaning and nuance in different ways.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rivals of

Focuses on the antagonistic relationship between entities.

contenders against

Emphasizes the act of striving or competing for something.

challengers to

Highlights the act of challenging someone's position or authority.

opponents of

Indicates a direct adversarial position.

competitors with

Similar in meaning, but uses a different preposition.

those in competition with

More verbose, but emphasizes the competitive environment.

companies competing with

Specifically refers to companies and their competitive actions.

firms vying against

Highlights the active struggle for dominance between firms.

businesses challenging

Focuses on the act of businesses presenting a challenge.

rival organizations

Emphasizes the organizational aspect of the rivalry.

FAQs

How can I use "competitors to" in a sentence?

Use "competitors to" to indicate entities or individuals that are in direct competition with a specific subject. For instance, "These companies are the main "competitors to" our leading product."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "competitors to"?

Alternatives include "rivals of", "challengers to", and "contenders against", each carrying slight nuances in meaning.

Is it more appropriate to use "competitors to" or "competitors with"?

Both "competitors to" and "competitors with" are grammatically acceptable, but "competitors to" often implies a more direct and targeted rivalry. The best choice depends on the specific context you want to convey.

What is the difference between "competitors to" and "rivals of"?

"Competitors to" generally refers to entities striving for the same goal or market share. "Rivals of", on the other hand, often implies a more personal or longstanding animosity or antagonism, even if the objective is the same.