compared to experts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "compared to experts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when making a comparison between someone's knowledge, skills, or performance and that of professionals in a particular field. Example: "Her understanding of the subject is impressive, especially when compared to experts in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

The automatic detection results are compared to experts' manual annotations (101 spikes) on a whole-night sleep EEG recording.

Brain Informatics

Results indicate that, compared to experts, the computationally-generated structure is sensible in clustering of patents and organization of clusters.

Design Studies

ANOVA results for the non-expert raters similarly reflected those of the overall group assessment, which was anticipated considering the sample size of the non-experts compared to experts.

Fashion and Textiles

They do not have a broad experience compared to experts in the field, but are the ones who decide on antidepressant use.

BMC Health Services Research

The hypothetico-deductive model of clinical reasoning states that compared to experts intermediates and novices tend to gather more information to test their hypotheses.

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Secondly, there was a selective loss of verbal explanations: although they were equally divided over the cases, fewer of these explanations were collected among intermediates and novices as compared to experts.

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of self-assessment is that students appear under-qualified to accurately assess their own learning when compared to expert (teacher) raters.

Language Testing in Asia

The patient's sensitivity for recognizing delirium compared to expert assessments was 38%, with a specificity of 66%, a PPV of 22% and a NPV of 80%.

Annals of Intensive Care

Compared to expert assessments, there were 7 misclassified CAM-ICU ratings among the 108 ratings, of which there were 7 false negatives and no false positives.

Annals of Intensive Care

Uninformed optimization improved model performance by 29% compared to expert opinion-informed model, while sensitivity-analysis informed optimization improved model performance by 54%.

Environmental Modelling & Software

Models are compared and 8 out of 9 models are shown to have a statistically significant (p = 0.05) increase in area under the receiver operating characteristic when using the hybrid approach when compared to expert-only models.

Journal of Big Data

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "compared to experts", ensure you clearly define who the experts are and what criteria are being used for comparison. This adds credibility to your analysis.

Common error

Avoid implying that all experts share the same viewpoint or level of skill. Acknowledge potential differences in expertise or methodology to provide a more nuanced comparison.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "compared to experts" functions as a prepositional phrase that introduces a standard or benchmark against which something is being evaluated. As Ludwig AI states, it's used to make comparisons and contrasts across various domains.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "compared to experts" serves as a useful tool for benchmarking and establishing credibility by referencing established authorities. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English. While primarily found in scientific and professional contexts, using this phrase effectively requires clear definition of who these experts are and the criteria of comparison. Using alternative phrases such as "in relation to experts" or "assessed against experts" can provide a nuance. Overall, "compared to experts" remains a valuable asset for clear and credible communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

versus experts

Replaces "compared to" with "versus", indicating a more direct opposition or contrast.

in comparison with experts

A more formal alternative to "compared to", suitable for academic or professional writing.

in relation to experts

Emphasizes a relationship or connection being assessed against the standard set by experts.

when contrasted with experts

Highlights the act of contrasting as a key element of the comparison.

assessed against experts

Focuses on the evaluation process, where something is being measured against the expertise of professionals.

relative to experts

Indicates a proportional or dependent relationship to the standard set by experts.

alongside experts

Suggests a parallel examination, positioning the subject next to experts for comparison.

next to experts

Suggests a parallel positioning of the subject next to experts for the purpose of comparison.

vis-à-vis experts

A sophisticated term indicating a specific point of comparison concerning experts.

as opposed to experts

Highlights a distinct contrast or difference, making it suitable when emphasizing opposing characteristics.

FAQs

How do I use "compared to experts" in a sentence?

Use "compared to experts" to highlight differences or similarities between a subject and the standard set by professionals in a field. For instance, "The novice programmer's code, "compared to experts", lacked optimization and efficiency."

What are some alternatives to saying "compared to experts"?

Alternatives include "in relation to experts", "versus experts", or "assessed against experts", each offering a slightly different nuance in the comparison.

Which is correct, "compared to experts" or "compared with experts"?

Both "compared to experts" and "compared with experts" are grammatically correct. "Compared to" is generally preferred when highlighting differences, while "compared with" is used for similarities, but in most contexts, they are interchangeable.

What's the difference between "compared to experts" and "assessed by experts"?

"Compared to experts" implies a general comparison against a benchmark set by experts, while "assessed by experts" specifies that the evaluation was directly performed by experts. The former is a broad comparison, the latter a specific evaluation process.