comparable outcomes with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comparable outcomes with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing results or findings that can be measured or assessed against one another in a specific context. Example: "The study aimed to analyze the comparable outcomes with different treatment methods for the same condition."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

The results of Control and Calcitonin groups had comparable outcomes with the literature.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

While the literature on ATC-AQs is limited, some studies have demonstrated improved outcomes for pediatric trauma patients compared to ATCs alone (Oyetunji et al. 2011; Potoka et al. 2000) and comparable outcomes with PTCs (Potoka et al. 2000).

Injury Epidemiology

Although several studies have demonstrated comparable outcomes with THA/TKA after surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), the sustainability of the outcome after LSS surgery compared with THA/TKA remains uncertain.

The Spine Journal

Third, the quantitative synthesis focused on studies measuring comparable outcomes with similar designs, reducing methodological heterogeneity.

British Medical Journal

This is a pitfall, however, given other studies that have shown relatively comparable outcomes with the same treatment; it may be reasonable to combine the cases [ 12, 13].

BioMed Research International

The 22G FNA and 25G FNB groups exhibited comparable outcomes with respect to cytological diagnostic accuracy (97.4%% vs. 89.5 %, P = 0.358) and histological diagnostic accuracy (34.2 % vs. 52.6 %, P = 0.105).

BMC Gastroenterology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

However, subgroup analysis revealed that azacytidine conferred a significant survival advantage only in patients with AML MDS and those who attained a CR at any time after treatment initiation, while all other patients displayed comparable outcome with the non-AZA cohort.

Leukemia Research

Our result showed a comparable outcome with study done by Lam et al [ 13].

BMC Ophthalmology

68 69 The results of this study and previous studies lead to the overall conclusion that intermittent neurogenic claudication treated with decompression alone results in a comparable outcome compared with treatment with interspinous process device alone, interspinous process device combined with bony decompression, and 360° instrumented spondylodesis.

British Medical Journal

Subjects treated with the adhesive were able to achieve comparable outcomes compared to subjects with drains, while experiencing a decrease in the total number of invasive procedures required to manage postsurgical fluid accumulation-related issues.

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Our data suggest that with careful screening and management, patients with diabetes and those with renal and pulmonary disease can be safely transplanted with comparable outcomes, while patients with cardiovascular disease have higher risk and should be carefully investigated and managed for its complications in the long term.

BMJ Open

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing multiple studies or interventions, ensure that the measurement scales and outcome definitions are aligned to justify the use of the phrase "comparable outcomes with". Otherwise, consider using weaker terms like "related" or "associated".

Common error

Avoid using "comparable outcomes with" when the results being compared have significant methodological differences or were measured using different scales. Instead, acknowledge the limitations and use phrases like "similar trends" or "related findings".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comparable outcomes with" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying an implied noun by describing the nature of the outcomes in relation to a standard. Ludwig examples confirm its role in comparing results.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "comparable outcomes with" is a grammatically sound expression used to highlight the similarity between different results or approaches, often in a scientific or academic context. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is acceptable in written English. While not overly frequent, its usage is clear when results from different interventions are being weighed. Ensure that when utilizing this phrase, the compared results share similar methodologies and measurement scales to avoid overstating comparability. Alternatives such as "similar results to" or "equivalent outcomes with" can also be used based on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

similar results to

This alternative replaces "comparable outcomes" with "similar results", changing the noun and preposition.

equivalent results with

This phrase substitutes "comparable outcomes" with "equivalent results", emphasizing the equivalence of the outcomes.

analogous outcomes with

The term "analogous outcomes" replaces "comparable outcomes", suggesting a similarity in function or relation.

matching outcomes with

This option uses "matching outcomes" instead of "comparable outcomes", indicating a high degree of similarity.

consistent results with

Replaces "comparable outcomes" with "consistent results", focusing on the reliability and uniformity of the outcomes.

uniform outcomes with

This alternative uses "uniform outcomes" instead of "comparable outcomes", highlighting the lack of variation in the results.

parallel results to

This phrase replaces "comparable outcomes" with "parallel results", suggesting the results are similar and occur alongside each other.

related results with

This is a broader term, indicating a connection or association between the results, but not necessarily equivalence.

corresponding results with

This phrase substitutes "comparable outcomes" with "corresponding results", indicating results that are in agreement or alignment.

alike consequences to

Here, "comparable outcomes" is replaced with "alike consequences", shifting the focus to the effects or results of something.

FAQs

How can I use "comparable outcomes with" in a sentence?

You can use "comparable outcomes with" to indicate that different approaches, treatments, or interventions yield similar results. For example: "The new drug showed "comparable outcomes with" the standard treatment."

What are some alternatives to "comparable outcomes with"?

Alternatives include "similar results to", "equivalent outcomes with", or "matching outcomes with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "comparable outcomes between" instead of "comparable outcomes with"?

While "comparable outcomes between" is grammatically correct, ""comparable outcomes with"" is more appropriate when referring to a specific standard or established method. Use "between" when comparing two distinct entities.

What does "comparable outcomes with" imply about the data being compared?

Using ""comparable outcomes with"" implies that the data sets being compared are sufficiently similar in their methodology and measurement to allow for a meaningful comparison. If there are significant differences, other terms might be more accurate.