comparable outcome with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comparable outcome with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing results or findings that can be measured or assessed against one another. Example: "The study aimed to achieve a comparable outcome with previous research conducted in the same field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

However, subgroup analysis revealed that azacytidine conferred a significant survival advantage only in patients with AML MDS and those who attained a CR at any time after treatment initiation, while all other patients displayed comparable outcome with the non-AZA cohort.

Leukemia Research

Our result showed a comparable outcome with study done by Lam et al [ 13].

BMC Ophthalmology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The results of Control and Calcitonin groups had comparable outcomes with the literature.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

While the literature on ATC-AQs is limited, some studies have demonstrated improved outcomes for pediatric trauma patients compared to ATCs alone (Oyetunji et al. 2011; Potoka et al. 2000) and comparable outcomes with PTCs (Potoka et al. 2000).

Injury Epidemiology

Although several studies have demonstrated comparable outcomes with THA/TKA after surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), the sustainability of the outcome after LSS surgery compared with THA/TKA remains uncertain.

The Spine Journal

Third, the quantitative synthesis focused on studies measuring comparable outcomes with similar designs, reducing methodological heterogeneity.

British Medical Journal

This is a pitfall, however, given other studies that have shown relatively comparable outcomes with the same treatment; it may be reasonable to combine the cases [ 12, 13].

BioMed Research International

The 22G FNA and 25G FNB groups exhibited comparable outcomes with respect to cytological diagnostic accuracy (97.4%% vs. 89.5 %, P = 0.358) and histological diagnostic accuracy (34.2 % vs. 52.6 %, P = 0.105).

BMC Gastroenterology

Given the comparable outcomes with ELF, FAMTX and FUP, the EORTC concluded that 'based on their low activity in advanced gastric cancer, none of these regimens can be regarded as standard treatment' (Vanhoefer et al, 2000).

British Journal of Cancer

Other observational studies have reported comparable outcomes with non-operative treatment versus reconstruction of ACL tears [ 97], some noting lower rates of OA in non-surgical groups [ 10, 14, 98].

Arthritis Research and Therapy

68 69 The results of this study and previous studies lead to the overall conclusion that intermittent neurogenic claudication treated with decompression alone results in a comparable outcome compared with treatment with interspinous process device alone, interspinous process device combined with bony decompression, and 360° instrumented spondylodesis.

British Medical Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "comparable outcome with", ensure that the items being compared are clearly defined and that the specific aspects of the outcome being compared are also well-defined. This ensures clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid substituting "with" for prepositions like "to" or "between" inappropriately. While "comparable outcome with" is correct, make sure the preposition accurately reflects the intended relationship between the outcomes being compared.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comparable outcome with" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that one result is similar or equivalent to another. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's generally correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "comparable outcome with" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate similarity between results, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While not extremely common, its usage is primarily found in formal and scientific contexts. When writing, ensure clear definition of what's being compared. Consider alternatives such as "similar result to" or "equivalent outcome to" for variety. Be mindful of correct preposition usage to maintain accuracy. The phrase is useful in academic writing or professional reports when highlighting similarities between different results or situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

similar result to

Replaces "outcome" with "result" and uses "to" instead of "with" for comparison.

equivalent outcome to

Substitutes "comparable" with "equivalent" to emphasize sameness.

analogous outcome to

Replaces "comparable" with "analogous" for a slightly more formal tone.

matching outcome to

Uses "matching" to highlight an exact correspondence in results.

corresponding outcome to

Similar to "matching outcome to", but slightly more formal.

consistent outcome with

Emphasizes the reliability and predictability of the outcome.

parallel outcome to

Suggests the outcome runs alongside another in a similar fashion.

alike outcome to

A more informal substitution, replacing "comparable" with "alike".

outcome on par with

Uses the idiom "on par with" to indicate equality in outcome.

indistinguishable outcome from

Highlights that the outcome is so similar it is difficult to tell apart.

FAQs

How can I use "comparable outcome with" in a sentence?

You can use "comparable outcome with" when you want to state that the result or effect of something is similar to that of something else. For instance: "The treatment showed a "comparable outcome with" the standard therapy".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "comparable outcome with"?

Some alternatives include "similar result to", "equivalent outcome to", or "analogous outcome to". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "comparable outcome to" instead of "comparable outcome with"?

While "comparable outcome with" is grammatically correct and frequently used, "comparable outcome to" can also be acceptable depending on the specific context. Using "with" emphasizes a direct relationship or comparison.

What is the difference between "comparable outcome with" and "similar outcome to"?

Both phrases indicate a similarity in results, but ""comparable outcome with"" suggests a degree of direct comparison or interaction between the two outcomes, while "similar outcome to" simply points out a resemblance.