comparable in validity to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comparable in validity to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the equivalence or similarity of the validity of two or more concepts, arguments, or pieces of evidence. Example: "The findings of this study are comparable in validity to those of previous research conducted in the same field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

On the one hand, the Dutch data seem to suggest that self-ratings, which are probably easier to obtain than LexTALE scores, are roughly comparable in their validity to LexTALE.

Behavior Research Methods

The SAQ-UK has comparable validity to the SAQ-US [ 54], and it has been used in studies of CABG [ 59].

BMC Nursing

The resulting measurements are comparable in precision to TMT-MS3/MS2.

Princeton University

It is comparable in size to Burundi, Haiti and Albania.

Wikipedia

Albuquerque is comparable in size to Miami, Atlanta, Denver, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Kansas City, and Omaha.

Huffington Post

AQ20 has discriminative properties and responsiveness comparable to more complex questionnaires such as SGRQ [ 24], and 15D and AQ20 have convergent validity to measure HRQoL in COPD [ 25].

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

In theory, there is some validity to this argument.

TechCrunch

We cover in turn threats to construct validity, to internal validity and to external validity.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

This indicates no greater variation among the studies than could be expected by chance and provides the validity to the meta-analysis by suggesting that studies included in this analysis are comparable.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

In other words, he says, there is no validity to reserves created after 1993.

The Guardian

"She gave validity to what women love to do in their homes," she said.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "comparable in validity to" when you want to emphasize that two different things provide similar levels of accuracy and reliability, despite potential differences in their methodology or context.

Common error

Avoid using "comparable in validity to" without providing sufficient evidence or data to support the claim. Overstating the comparability of validity can undermine the credibility of your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comparable in validity to" functions as a comparative adjective phrase used to describe the degree to which two or more things possess similar levels of validity. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

14%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "comparable in validity to" is a grammatically correct and usable expression used to assert that two or more things possess similar levels of validity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is suitable for various writing contexts, particularly in scientific and academic domains. It's important to provide supporting evidence when using this phrase to ensure the credibility of your claims. Alternatives include "equivalent in validity to" and "similarly valid to". While the phrase may not be as common as other comparative expressions, it carries a formal and precise tone, making it well-suited for professional and academic writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equivalent in validity to

Stresses the equal level of validity, suggesting they are practically the same.

similarly valid to

Focuses on the similarity of validity, emphasizing that the level of validity is alike.

of equal validity as

Emphasizes the equality of validity, positioning one as having the same level of validity as another.

analogous in validity to

Highlights the analogy or correspondence in validity between two or more things.

bears the same validity as

Highlights that both arguments or concepts carry the same degree of validity.

on par in validity with

Indicates that something is at the same level or standard of validity.

matches the validity of

Indicates a direct match or alignment in terms of validity.

commensurate in validity with

Suggests that the validity is proportional or corresponding in measure.

rivals in validity with

Presents two or more things as competing in terms of validity, implying they are nearly equal.

approximates the validity of

Suggests that the validity is close to, but not necessarily exactly the same as, another.

FAQs

How do you use "comparable in validity to" in a sentence?

You can use "comparable in validity to" to show that two different methods, tests, or pieces of evidence have similar levels of accuracy and reliability. For example, "The results of this new test are "comparable in validity to" the established gold standard".

What is a good substitute for "comparable in validity to"?

Alternatives to "comparable in validity to" include "equivalent in validity to", "similarly valid to", or "analogous in validity to". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does it mean for two studies to be "comparable in validity to" each other?

If two studies are "comparable in validity to" each other, it means that their findings are equally trustworthy and reliable, suggesting that they both accurately measure what they intend to measure.

Is it correct to say "comparable in validity with" instead of "comparable in validity to"?

While "with" might be used colloquially, "comparable in validity to" is the more grammatically standard and widely accepted phrasing in formal writing.