comparability of results

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comparability of results" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the ability to compare outcomes or findings from different studies, experiments, or datasets. Example: "The comparability of results across various studies is essential for drawing reliable conclusions in this field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Comparability of results in multinational clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research increases the relevance and generalizability of results.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The sheer breadth of Pisa has also raised questions about the comparability of results within it.

The Guardian

For comparability of results equivalent material parameters are used throughout.

Visualization in Engineering

To ensure the comparability of results, the simulation results are normalized.

Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications

Another relevant advantage of quantified assessments is the simplicity and comparability of results.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

be applicable independent of assessor's expertise (inter-subjectivity). be applicable to different models (comparability of results).

Energy, Sustainability and Society

The most severe challenges are the reproducibility and comparability of results.

Ecological Indicators

However, variations in preanalytical processing of samples and lack of established endogenous controls limit the comparability of results [21].

Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics

Although harmonized protocols guarantee the comparability of results, PIAAC remains a collection of country surveys, each of which has been constructed independently.

IZA Journal of Labor Economics

For that reason, the comparability of results revealed by large scale studies cannot be taken for granted but has to be scrutinized.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

Count scores provide information about the importance and hierarchy of attributes but fail to ensure comparability of results across BWS studies.

Health Economics Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientific papers, ensure that you clearly describe the methods used to enhance the "comparability of results", such as standardization or normalization techniques.

Common error

Avoid claiming complete "comparability of results" without acknowledging potential limitations like differences in data collection or sample populations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comparability of results" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a preposition (e.g., to ensure the comparability of results) or as a subject complement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

News & Media

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "comparability of results" is frequently used, particularly in scientific and academic contexts, to describe the extent to which different sets of results can be validly compared. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and appropriate for use in professional writing. To ensure "comparability of results", it's essential to use standardized methodologies and clearly define key variables. Alternative phrases like "consistency of results" and "similarity of findings" can be used depending on the specific nuances you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consistency of results

Focuses on the uniformity and reliability of the findings across different instances.

consistency in outcomes

Emphasizes the uniformity and predictability of outcomes.

similarity of findings

Highlights the degree to which different findings resemble each other.

alignment of outcomes

Focuses on how well different outcomes match or agree with each other.

correlation of outcomes

Indicates the degree to which outcomes are related or associated with each other.

concordance of results

Emphasizes the agreement or harmony among different results.

harmonization of data

Focuses on the process of making data consistent and comparable.

uniformity of findings

Highlights the consistent nature of the findings.

equivalence of results

Indicates that different results are essentially the same or interchangeable.

interchangeability of findings

Focuses on the degree to which findings can be used in place of one another without affecting the overall interpretation.

FAQs

How can I ensure the "comparability of results" in my study?

To improve the "comparability of results", use standardized methodologies, validated measurement instruments, and clear definitions. Also, consider normalizing your data to minimize the impact of external factors.

What factors can affect the "comparability of results" between different studies?

Differences in study design, sample populations, measurement instruments, and data analysis techniques can all affect the "comparability of results". Addressing these factors is crucial for drawing reliable conclusions.

What are some alternatives to "comparability of results"?

You can use alternatives like "consistency of results", "similarity of findings", or "alignment of outcomes" depending on the specific context.

Why is the "comparability of results" important in scientific research?

The "comparability of results" allows researchers to synthesize findings across multiple studies, conduct meta-analyses, and build upon existing knowledge. Without comparability, it's difficult to draw meaningful conclusions or make informed decisions.