collision with

USAGE SUMMARY

'collision with' is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase is usually used to refer to an instance in which two or more objects come into contact with each other, usually with resulting damage or injury. For example, "The driver lost control of the car, leading to a collision with a tree."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

The collision with Schrader had two effects.

The New York Times - Sports

So far there has been a mid-air collision with China, a maritime collision with Japan and a diplomatic collision with the two Koreas.

The New York Times

And it would lead to a collision with other unions.

The New York Times

She's penalised after a collision with Li Jianrou.

The Guardian - Sport

American officials ruled out any collision with an American submarine.

The New York Times

Another possibility, he said, was a collision with another ship.

The New York Times

I had a little bit of a collision with Jenson.

Independent

Davis was injured Tuesday in an infield collision with Wright.

The New York Times - Sports

His collision with car 99 (Sutil) was reckless".

Independent

Was there a near collision with the DC-9?

The New York Times

The mountains' collision with the coast became ever steeper.

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing events, use "collision with" to accurately portray the impact between two entities. It is suitable for both literal and figurative scenarios.

Common error

Avoid using "collision with" when describing abstract disagreements or differences of opinion unless there is a clear, forceful clash. Alternatives like "conflict with" or "disagreement with" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "collision with" functions as a prepositional phrase, often serving as an adverbial modifier to describe the manner in which something happens or the result of an event. Ludwig's examples show its usage in describing literal physical impacts as well as more abstract conflicts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

72%

Science

14%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "collision with" is a versatile phrase used to describe both physical impacts and figurative clashes. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. With a neutral register, it appears frequently in news, scientific, and encyclopedic sources. When using the phrase, ensure that the context accurately reflects a forceful contact or conflict. For abstract disagreements, consider alternatives like "conflict with" or "opposition to". Remember that "a collision with" indicates a specific instance, while "collision with" describes the general concept.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

impact with

Focuses more on the immediate effect of the contact.

crash into

Implies a forceful and often destructive encounter.

smash against

Suggests a violent and shattering impact.

encounter with

A more general term for a meeting, which may or may not be violent.

conflict with

Refers to a disagreement or clash, not necessarily physical.

clash with

Suggests a brief but intense confrontation.

strike against

Highlights the act of hitting or impacting something.

bump into

Implies a minor, often accidental, contact.

run into

Can mean an accidental meeting or a more forceful impact.

opposition to

Describes a state of being against something, not necessarily a direct physical impact.

FAQs

How can I use "collision with" in a sentence?

You can use "collision with" to describe an impact between two objects, such as "The car had a "collision with" the tree" or a figurative clash, like "His ideas were in "collision with" the established norms".

What are some alternatives to "collision with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "impact with", "crash into", or "encounter with".

When is it more appropriate to use "conflict with" instead of "collision with"?

"Conflict with" is better suited for describing disagreements or opposing views, while "collision with" typically refers to a physical impact or a forceful clash of ideas. For example, "The new policy "conflicts with" existing regulations" is preferable to "The new policy is in "collision with" existing regulations" if you are not referring to a direct and forceful clash.

Is there a difference between "a collision with" and "collision with"?

The use of "a" depends on the context. "A collision with" refers to a single, specific incident, while "collision with" can refer to the general concept or repeated occurrences. For instance, "He described a "collision with" another car" versus "Research shows the dangers of "collision with" wildlife on highways".