collateral population

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "collateral population" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to demographics, economics, or social sciences, often referring to a group that is indirectly affected by a situation or policy. Example: "The study revealed that the collateral population experienced significant changes in their living conditions due to the new regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

These shifts may improve police occupational safety by reducing the prevalence of adverse encounters with PWID, but they may also have collateral population health benefits such as reducing risk behaviour and infectious disease incidence among PWID.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Additional factors to consider may include transmissibility or population risk, collateral benefits to disease control, and public interest.

Plosone

However, the age of the study population and collateral information on relationship stability in the CAF lead us to believe that the average duration is well above the five years used in the 2009 GSS [ 2].

BMC Public Health

"His sentencing hearing will provide him with a forum for denouncing U.S. policies in the Muslim world," the memo continues, "and to identify U.S. military actions which have undeniably produced unintended collateral harm to civilian populations far greater than even the Nairobi embassy bombing".

The New York Times

Both peptidergic populations extend collateral processes locally, as well as to the dorsal AVP-containing region [58].

Plosone

However, there is no literature discussing about the predictor of poor coronary collaterals in the CKD population with SCAD.

BMC Nephrology

However, there is no research discussing about the predictors of poor collaterals in the CKD population with significant coronary artery disease (SCAD).

BMC Nephrology

The original aim was to focus economic pressure on key individuals and entities, but avoid causing extensive collateral damage to the general population.

The Guardian

America's only recently revised manual on conducting counter-insurgency operations cautions against over-reliance on firepower in general and specifically cautions that the benefits of air strikes "should be weighed against the risks, the primary danger being collateral damage that turns the population against the government and provides the insurgents with a major propaganda victory".

The Guardian - Opinion

That's why the US army's highly touted new field manual on counterinsurgency warns that the "employment of airpower in the strike role should be done with exceptional care": Bombing, even air strikes, should be weighed against the risks, the primary danger being collateral damage that turns the population against the government and provides the insurgents with a major propaganda victory.

The Guardian - Opinion

But human rights activists argue the drone strikes amount to extrajudicial killings, and neutral observers worry that collateral casualties amongst the civilian population further deepen hostility to the US.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing unintended consequences, use "collateral population" to precisely denote groups indirectly affected by a specific action or policy.

Common error

Do not use "collateral population" interchangeably with terms like "general public"; reserve it for situations where a specific group experiences indirect effects.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "collateral population" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. It identifies a specific group of individuals indirectly affected by an event or policy. Ludwig AI affirms its correct usage in contexts where secondary impacts are discussed.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "collateral population" is a grammatically correct and relatively rare term used to describe a specific group of individuals indirectly affected by a particular event, action, or policy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for formal contexts, particularly in academic or policy-related discussions. While alternatives like "indirectly affected group" or "secondary demographic" exist, "collateral population" offers a precise way to categorize and analyze those broader consequences. When using this term, ensure it accurately reflects an indirect impact rather than a generalized effect on the entire population.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

indirectly impacted group

Emphasizes the indirect nature of the effect on the population.

secondarily affected group

Stresses that the group's impact is of secondary importance.

secondary demographic

Focuses on the indirect or secondary impact on a specific segment of the population.

affected community

Highlights the impact on a specific local or regional group.

byproduct demographic

Implies the population is affected as a byproduct or side effect.

incidentally affected people

Suggests that the population was impacted as a consequence of an event or action.

consequential demographic

Indicates that the demographic changes are a result of other preceding events.

downstream population

Implies a sequential impact, similar to effects in a river or supply chain.

peripheral community

Highlights the marginal or less central impact on a particular community.

ripple effect population

Uses the metaphor of a ripple effect to describe the cascading impact on a community.

FAQs

How can I use "collateral population" in a sentence?

You can use "collateral population" to describe a group indirectly affected by a particular event or policy. For example, "The study examined the impact of the new regulations on the "collateral population"."

What's the difference between "collateral population" and "general population"?

"Collateral population" refers to a specific subgroup indirectly affected by an event, while "general population" refers to everyone. Using "general population" implies a widespread impact, whereas "collateral population" highlights a more targeted effect.

What can I say instead of "collateral population"?

Alternatives include "indirectly affected group", "secondary demographic", or "incidentally affected people", depending on the context.

Is "collateral population" a formal term?

Yes, "collateral population" is suitable for formal and academic contexts, especially when discussing policy impacts or research findings. It offers a precise way to describe specific groups experiencing indirect consequences.