Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
cognitive sloth
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "cognitive sloth" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a lack of mental effort or engagement in thinking or problem-solving. Example: "In today's fast-paced world, many people fall into cognitive sloth, opting for easy answers instead of critical thinking."
✓ Grammatically correct
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
This didn't matter as much as I thought though, as the backstories behind each move gave another value of the lessons for those just realising they have the cognitive dexterity of a sloth on ket binge.
News & Media
Overall, an engineering approach means building systems to mitigate cognitive errors rather than assuming they result from mere arrogance, stupidity, or sloth.
Science
So do cognitive ability, earning power, and even greed and sloth.This is a new take on biological determinism.
News & Media
MOTH: Sloth?
News & Media
Sloth's best.
News & Media
Torpor and sloth, torpor and sloth,.
News & Media
Was there a sloth?
News & Media
Manaster, J. Sloth squeak.
Science & Research
Stop enabling sloth.
News & Media
Photograph: Mark Kostich/Getty MOTH: Sloth?
News & Media
MOTH: Hello, Sloth.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "cognitive sloth" sparingly, as it may not be immediately understood by all audiences. Consider providing context or using a more common synonym like "mental laziness" for clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "cognitive sloth" in contexts where simpler language would be more effective. Overly complex vocabulary can alienate readers and obscure your message.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "cognitive sloth" functions as a noun phrase, where the adjective "cognitive" modifies the noun "sloth". This creates a metaphorical expression describing a state of mental inactivity or laziness. Ludwig AI indicates that while grammatically correct, the phrase is not widely used.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "cognitive sloth" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe a lack of mental effort or engagement in thinking. Though correct, it is not a commonly used expression; alternatives like "mental laziness" or "intellectual apathy" are often preferred. As indicated by Ludwig AI, its applicability spans various contexts, though primarily leaning towards neutral and slightly critical discussions. While the phrase might not be universally understood, its evocative nature can effectively convey the concept of mental inactivity. When using "cognitive sloth", be mindful of your audience and consider providing context to ensure clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Mental laziness
Replaces "cognitive" with "mental" and "sloth" with "laziness", offering a more direct and common way to express the concept.
Intellectual apathy
Substitutes "cognitive" with "intellectual" and "sloth" with "apathy", highlighting a lack of interest or concern in intellectual matters.
Lack of mental engagement
Rephrases the idea as a deficiency in mental involvement or activity, providing a more descriptive alternative.
Cognitive idleness
Replaces "sloth" with "idleness", suggesting a state of inactivity or avoidance of mental work.
Mental inactivity
Focuses on the absence of mental activity, offering a straightforward alternative to "cognitive sloth".
Intellectual inertia
Uses "inertia" to convey a resistance to change or activity in intellectual pursuits, implying a difficulty in getting started or changing course.
Thinking fatigue
Suggests a state of weariness or exhaustion from thinking, leading to a reluctance to engage in cognitive tasks.
Cognitive passivity
Emphasizes a lack of active participation in cognitive processes, suggesting a receptive but not proactive mental state.
Disinclination to think
Expresses a lack of willingness or motivation to engage in thought, providing a more explicit alternative.
Mental stagnation
Implies a lack of progress or development in one's thinking, suggesting a state of being stuck or unmoving.
FAQs
How can I use "cognitive sloth" in a sentence?
While less common, you can use "cognitive sloth" to describe a state of mental inactivity or unwillingness to engage in complex thinking. For example: "The constant stream of information can lead to "cognitive sloth", as people opt for easy answers rather than critical analysis."
What are some alternatives to "cognitive sloth"?
Alternatives include "mental laziness", "intellectual apathy", or a lack of mental engagement. The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.
Is "cognitive sloth" a formal or informal term?
"Cognitive sloth" leans toward the formal side due to its use of "cognitive", but it is not a widely recognized term. In more casual settings, "mental laziness" might be more appropriate.
What does "cognitive sloth" imply about a person's thinking?
It suggests a state where someone avoids or is disinclined to engage in deep thinking, preferring to accept information passively rather than actively analyzing it.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested