Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
clues were apparent
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "clues were apparent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that certain signs or hints were clearly visible or understandable in a given context. Example: "As the investigation progressed, it became clear that the clues were apparent to anyone paying attention."
✓ Grammatically correct
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Further clues to the killer's motives were apparent at his home in a nondescript apartment block on Tunhemsvägen, a residential area.
News & Media
Some clues should be apparent, however, when the company releases its quarterly financial report at the end of the month.
News & Media
Some of the most clever clues will be apparent to you only after you solve and then look back at the crossings, like "Text attachment?", which is not a computer term at all, but instead refers to the suffix ILE that turns "text" into "TextILE".
News & Media
Some trends were apparent.
News & Media
Other problems were apparent.
News & Media
Two things were apparent.
News & Media
But flaws were apparent.
News & Media
Two trends were apparent.
Science
Clues were few.
News & Media
Tactile clues were essential.
News & Media
No clues were revealed.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "clues were apparent", ensure the context clearly establishes what those clues refer to, providing specific details or examples to reinforce understanding. For example, instead of simply stating "clues were apparent", specify: "The clues were apparent: the muddy footprints and the open window clearly indicated a break-in".
Common error
Avoid using "clues were apparent" when the clues are already self-evident in the context. Redundancy weakens your writing. For instance, if you've thoroughly described visible indicators, stating the clues were apparent becomes unnecessary and repetitive.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "clues were apparent" functions as a statement indicating that certain signs or hints were easily noticeable or understandable. Based on Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and can be used to convey that something was easily perceived.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "clues were apparent" is a grammatically sound expression used to convey that certain signs or hints were easily noticeable. While no direct examples were found in the provided data, Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Alternative phrases like "hints were obvious" or "signs were evident" can be used to express similar meanings. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly defines the clues to avoid ambiguity. It maintains a neutral register, making it suitable for various communication styles. The phrase is valuable for indicating that information was readily available to those who were looking for it.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
hints were obvious
Replaces "clues" with "hints" and "apparent" with "obvious", emphasizing ease of recognition.
signs were evident
Substitutes "clues" with "signs" and "apparent" with "evident", maintaining a formal tone.
indications were clear
Uses "indications" instead of "clues" and "clear" in place of "apparent", highlighting unambiguity.
the evidence was visible
Replaces "clues" with "evidence" and "apparent" with "visible", changing the focus to proof.
detectable signs existed
More formal phrasing, using "detectable" and "existed" for emphasis.
it was obvious what was happening
Shifts to an explanation of the situation rather than direct reference to clues.
discernible indicators were present
Employs elevated vocabulary, creating a more scholarly expression.
the telltale signs stood out
Uses more figurative language emphasizing the clarity and prominence of the clues.
the answer was in plain sight
Implies the solution was easily discoverable, differing from the original's focus on clues.
the solution was obvious
Focuses on the result rather than the process of finding clues, making it less specific.
FAQs
How can I use "clues were apparent" in a sentence?
You can use "clues were apparent" to indicate that certain signs or hints were clearly visible or understandable in a situation. For example, "As the investigation progressed, the "clues were apparent" to anyone paying attention".
What can I say instead of "clues were apparent"?
You can use alternatives such as "hints were obvious", "signs were evident", or "indications were clear" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "clues were apparent" or "the clues were obvious"?
Both ""clues were apparent"" and "the clues were obvious" are grammatically correct. The choice depends on the desired tone and context. "Apparent" is slightly more formal than "obvious".
What does it mean when someone says "clues were apparent"?
When someone says ""clues were apparent"", it means that the signs or indications of something were easily noticeable or understandable. It suggests that the information was readily available to those who were looking for it.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested