close supervision

USAGE SUMMARY

"close supervision" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which someone in a position of authority closely monitors the activities of someone else. For example: "The new interns were given close supervision during their first days on the job."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Floor managers kept close supervision.

The New York Times

"It takes close supervision," he said.

The New York Times

Whenever possible, she kept him under close supervision.

The New York Times

As a result Greenland is under close supervision.

The Guardian

As a minister, you're under very close supervision.

The Guardian

The close supervision was extended to another area: the Baltics.

The New York Times

The monkeys were under close supervision by the university veterinarians.

Nature

His recording had the benefit of the composer's close supervision.

Independent

Close supervision and feedback on the health-worker performance are also needed.

Acta Tropica

The last emergency loan was put together in August, with Mr. O'Neill's close supervision.

The New York Times

Both emphasised the close supervision of the work by the British government.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "close supervision" to emphasize the need for careful monitoring and control, especially when detailing safety protocols, training programs, or sensitive operations.

Common error

Avoid using "close supervision" when you actually mean micromanagement. "Close supervision" implies necessary oversight, while micromanagement suggests excessive control that stifles autonomy and productivity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "close supervision" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It usually acts as the object of a preposition or as a subject complement, denoting the action or state of being closely monitored or managed. Ludwig provides examples from news, science, and encyclopedias illustrating this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

40%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

2%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "close supervision" is a very common and grammatically correct noun phrase that indicates careful and intensive monitoring. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts. It is frequently found in news, science, and formal documents and it emphasizes the need for oversight in situations requiring control and safety. When using this phrase, be mindful of the potential for confusion with micromanagement, and consider alternatives like "direct oversight" or "strict monitoring" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

direct oversight

Emphasizes the immediate and personal involvement in monitoring activities.

strict monitoring

Highlights the rigor and adherence to rules in the supervisory process.

careful management

Focuses on the judicious and attentive handling of tasks or individuals.

hands-on control

Suggests a very active and involved approach to supervision.

intensive monitoring

Implies a high degree of focus and resources dedicated to observation.

rigorous observation

Emphasizes the thorough and exacting nature of the monitoring.

attentive guidance

Highlights the supportive and observant aspects of supervision.

vigilant oversight

Implies a watchful and proactive approach to preventing issues.

stringent control

Focuses on the severity and exacting nature of the managerial power.

meticulous direction

Highlights the precision and detail-oriented nature of the guidance.

FAQs

How is "close supervision" typically used in a sentence?

"Close supervision" is generally used to indicate that someone or something is being carefully monitored. For example, "The project required "close supervision" to ensure its success".

What are some alternatives to using "close supervision"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "direct oversight", "strict monitoring", or "careful management" to convey a similar meaning.

When is "close supervision" necessary?

"Close supervision" is often necessary in situations where safety is a concern, when training new employees, or when managing complex projects. It ensures that tasks are completed correctly and potential problems are addressed promptly.

What's the difference between "close supervision" and "general supervision"?

"Close supervision" implies more intensive and frequent monitoring, while "general supervision" suggests a more hands-off approach. The choice depends on the level of risk, complexity, and the experience of the individuals being supervised.