Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
close agreement with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "close agreement with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that two or more parties share similar views, opinions, or findings on a particular subject. Example: "The researchers found that their results were in close agreement with previous studies on the same topic."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Simulation results are found in close agreement with theoretical results.
These results are in close agreement with the model predictions.
Science
Experimental results reveal close agreement with CFD predictions.
The results were in close agreement with the model prediction.
Science
Experimental measurements are found in close agreement with theory.
Science
Simulation results yielded close agreement with measured Tmrt.
Science
These results are in close agreement with the model parameters.
Science
The results show a close agreement with the experimental work.
This is in close agreement with spectroscopic data.
Science
Predictions were in close agreement with measured results.
Experimental measurements show close agreement with the theory.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "close agreement with" to clearly and concisely express that different sets of data, findings, or opinions are highly similar. This adds credibility to your statements by highlighting consistency.
Common error
Avoid using "close agreement with" when the match is only approximate or partial. Use more moderate language like "some agreement with" or "partial agreement with" to maintain accuracy and avoid misleading your audience.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "close agreement with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a strong similarity or correspondence between two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature. It commonly connects experimental results with theoretical predictions or models, as seen in the examples.
Frequent in
Science
70%
Academia
15%
News & Media
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "close agreement with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that indicates a high degree of similarity or correspondence between two or more things. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it serves to validate findings and reinforce arguments. When using this phrase, it's crucial to ensure that the agreement is indeed substantial to avoid overstating the relationship. Alternatives like "strong correspondence with" or "high concordance with" can be considered for nuanced expressions. This phrase underscores the importance of precision and accuracy in conveying the extent of agreement in various domains.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
strong correspondence with
Emphasizes the similarity or relationship between two things, but with a focus on direct links or connections.
high concordance with
Highlights the level of agreement or harmony between different elements or sources of information.
near equivalence to
Suggests the items being compared are practically the same in value, meaning, or effect.
substantial alignment with
Indicates a significant degree of agreement, particularly in terms of position or direction.
good correlation with
Focuses on the statistical relationship between two or more variables.
consistent with
Indicates that something is in harmony or agreement with something else without necessarily being a "close" agreement.
comparable to
Highlights the similarity in quality or nature between two or more items.
in line with
Suggests conformity or agreement with a standard, rule, or plan.
bears resemblance to
Focuses on superficial similarities or likeness in appearance or character.
mirrors
Indicates that something reflects or closely imitates something else.
FAQs
How can I use "close agreement with" in a sentence?
You can use "close agreement with" to show that two or more sets of data, opinions, or results are highly similar. For example: "The experimental results are in "close agreement with" the theoretical predictions."
What's an alternative to "close agreement with"?
Alternatives to "close agreement with" include phrases like "strong correspondence with", "high concordance with", or "substantial alignment with", which convey similar meanings depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "in close agreement to" instead of "in close agreement with"?
While "in close agreement" is acceptable, the more standard and widely used construction is "in "close agreement with"". The preposition "with" is typically used to indicate what something is in agreement with.
What does "close agreement with" imply about the relationship between two things?
"Close agreement with" suggests that the two things being compared are very similar or consistent. It indicates a high degree of correspondence and can imply that the findings or opinions are mutually supportive.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested