Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

close agreement with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "close agreement with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that two or more parties share similar views, opinions, or findings on a particular subject. Example: "The researchers found that their results were in close agreement with previous studies on the same topic."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Simulation results are found in close agreement with theoretical results.

These results are in close agreement with the model predictions.

Experimental results reveal close agreement with CFD predictions.

The results were in close agreement with the model prediction.

Experimental measurements are found in close agreement with theory.

Simulation results yielded close agreement with measured Tmrt.

These results are in close agreement with the model parameters.

The results show a close agreement with the experimental work.

This is in close agreement with spectroscopic data.

Predictions were in close agreement with measured results.

Experimental measurements show close agreement with the theory.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "close agreement with" to clearly and concisely express that different sets of data, findings, or opinions are highly similar. This adds credibility to your statements by highlighting consistency.

Common error

Avoid using "close agreement with" when the match is only approximate or partial. Use more moderate language like "some agreement with" or "partial agreement with" to maintain accuracy and avoid misleading your audience.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "close agreement with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a strong similarity or correspondence between two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature. It commonly connects experimental results with theoretical predictions or models, as seen in the examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

Academia

15%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "close agreement with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that indicates a high degree of similarity or correspondence between two or more things. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it serves to validate findings and reinforce arguments. When using this phrase, it's crucial to ensure that the agreement is indeed substantial to avoid overstating the relationship. Alternatives like "strong correspondence with" or "high concordance with" can be considered for nuanced expressions. This phrase underscores the importance of precision and accuracy in conveying the extent of agreement in various domains.

FAQs

How can I use "close agreement with" in a sentence?

You can use "close agreement with" to show that two or more sets of data, opinions, or results are highly similar. For example: "The experimental results are in "close agreement with" the theoretical predictions."

What's an alternative to "close agreement with"?

Alternatives to "close agreement with" include phrases like "strong correspondence with", "high concordance with", or "substantial alignment with", which convey similar meanings depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "in close agreement to" instead of "in close agreement with"?

While "in close agreement" is acceptable, the more standard and widely used construction is "in "close agreement with"". The preposition "with" is typically used to indicate what something is in agreement with.

What does "close agreement with" imply about the relationship between two things?

"Close agreement with" suggests that the two things being compared are very similar or consistent. It indicates a high degree of correspondence and can imply that the findings or opinions are mutually supportive.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: