clearly missed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clearly missed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was obviously overlooked or not noticed. Example: "The opportunity to collaborate on the project was clearly missed by the team during the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sport

Opinion

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

She clearly missed New York.

The New York Times

All three were clearly missed.

The Guardian - Sport

But Hamilton is clearly missed.

The New York Times - Sports

But he clearly missed that opportunity.

The Guardian - Opinion

The company clearly missed something crucial.

The Guardian - Opinion

The Hornets clearly missed West, a former All-Star.

The New York Times - Sports

The Revs clearly missed central midfielder Clyde Simms.

The Guardian - Sport

Putting aside the antitrust laws, AT&T clearly missed the shifting mood in Washington.

The New York Times

Costa Rica also clearly missed injured goalkeeper Keylor Navas and suspended defender Kendall Waston.

The Guardian - Sport

The Islanders clearly missed Czerkawski's scoring ability last season, and now he has something to prove.

The New York Times - Sports

It's more certain that the company clearly missed an opportunity to build any lasting brand loyalty.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "clearly missed" to emphasize that something was not just missed, but that the failure to notice or include it was obvious or significant.

Common error

Avoid using "clearly missed" when the 'missed' aspect is a matter of opinion. Reserve it for scenarios where the absence or oversight is demonstrably evident to most observers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clearly missed" functions as a verb phrase, often acting as a predicate in a sentence. It indicates that someone failed to notice, understand, or take advantage of something, or that something was noticeably absent. Ludwig AI examples show it describing missed opportunities, absences, or understandings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Sport

15%

Opinion

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "clearly missed" is a frequently used and grammatically sound phrase indicating an obvious oversight or absence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it commonly appears in News & Media contexts, serving to emphasize a failure to notice or capitalize on something. While versatile, it's best used when the 'missed' aspect is demonstrably evident, avoiding overuse in purely subjective contexts. For alternatives, consider phrases like "obviously overlooked" or "noticeably absent". The phrase enjoys support from authoritative sources and has a neutral register.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obviously overlooked

Emphasizes the oversight aspect more strongly than "clearly missed".

noticeably absent

Focuses on the absence of a person or thing and the impact of that absence.

evidently neglected

Highlights the lack of attention or care given, resulting in the thing being missed.

distinctly lacking

Highlights a clear deficiency or shortage.

plainly disregarded

Focuses on the act of intentionally ignoring something, unlike simply missing it.

transparently ignored

Emphasizes the obvious nature of the act of ignoring something.

definitely forgotten

Stresses the act of something being completely out of mind.

unmistakably unseen

Focuses on the failure to notice something that should have been obvious.

patently unheeded

Indicates that a warning or advice was clearly ignored.

conspicuously omitted

Highlights the act of intentionally leaving something out.

FAQs

How can I use "clearly missed" in a sentence?

You can use "clearly missed" to indicate that something was obviously overlooked or not noticed, such as: "The deadline was "clearly missed", resulting in penalties."

What are some alternatives to "clearly missed"?

Some alternatives include "obviously overlooked", "evidently neglected", or "noticeably absent", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "clearly missed" or "obviously missed"?

Both "clearly missed" and "obviously missed" are acceptable. The choice depends on personal preference and the specific nuance you want to convey. "Clearly missed" may suggest a more demonstrable oversight.

What's the difference between "clearly missed" and "completely missed"?

"Clearly missed" implies that the oversight was evident or obvious, while "completely missed" simply means that something was entirely overlooked, without necessarily implying it was obvious.