Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

clear evidence for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clear evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing proof or support for a particular claim, argument, or theory. Example: "The study provided clear evidence for the effectiveness of the new treatment in reducing symptoms."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Spectroscopic methods and X-ray diffraction give clear evidence for the reaction of nitrenes with the nanotube sidewall.

Science

Carbon

Clear evidence for what will work best is rare.

Below the formation potential of 10V, the spectra showed clear evidence for the formation of Rutile.

Rapid discharge of Br in the monoliths was taken as a clear evidence for preferential flow.

Both species exhibited a strong environmental effect with clear evidence for a central climatic optimum.

Despite clear evidence for direct backup, the prevalence of indirect backup is poorly understood.

This study shows clear evidence for the influence of FBS type on mineralization on SF scaffolds.

The findings, they said, provide clear evidence for the first theory.

There is no clear evidence for the geographic place of origin of the grasses.

Transmission electron microscopy provides clear evidence for the formation of a multilayer structure for all the coatings.

Transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy images provide clear evidence for the formation of few layer graphene.

Science

Carbon
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "clear evidence for" a claim, ensure that the evidence is verifiable, relevant, and directly supports the assertion. Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating how the evidence connects to your conclusion.

Common error

Avoid using "clear evidence for" when the evidence is circumstantial or open to interpretation. Using weaker terms like "suggests" or "indicates" may be more accurate and avoid overstating your claim.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clear evidence for" functions as an evidential marker, introducing information that supports a particular claim or argument. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

Academia

17%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "clear evidence for" is a frequently used phrase that signals the presence of strong support for a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across diverse sources like science, academia, and news. While versatile, it's important to ensure the evidence genuinely warrants the "clear" descriptor to avoid overstating your point. Alternatives such as "compelling proof of" or "strong indication of" can offer nuanced options depending on the context. Remember to use "clear evidence for" when presenting facts, ensuring these facts are verifiable and directly related to your conclusion.

FAQs

How can I use "clear evidence for" in a sentence?

You can use "clear evidence for" to introduce factual support for a claim. For example, "The research provides "clear evidence for" the effectiveness of the new drug".

What are some alternatives to "clear evidence for"?

Alternatives include "compelling proof of", "strong indication of", or "definitive confirmation of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "clear and obvious evidence for"?

While not strictly incorrect, "clear and obvious evidence for" can be redundant. "Clear evidence for" usually suffices unless you specifically want to emphasize the readily apparent nature of the evidence.

What kind of evidence qualifies as "clear evidence for"?

"Clear evidence for" typically refers to evidence that is direct, easily understood, and strongly supports a particular conclusion, minimizing room for doubt or alternative interpretations.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: