clear discrepancies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clear discrepancies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to obvious or easily identifiable differences or inconsistencies in data, information, or statements. Example: "The audit revealed clear discrepancies in the financial reports that need to be addressed immediately."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

Our findings show clear discrepancies between current players and key players, highlighting missed opportunities for progressing more effective conservation diffusion.

Biological Conservation

Allegations of conspiracy have been bolstered by the dashcam video footage, which exposed clear discrepancies with the arrest report filed by Encinia.

The Guardian

However, the results of the study reveal many clear discrepancies between the isotopic composition of precipitation and shallow groundwater in the area.

Journal of Hydrology

Looking at the clear discrepancies between the MLC model and the medusa-generation of C. plocamia, we argue for life cycle traits that are not included in the model as it stands (Fig. 5): our results suggest that the medusa- and polyp-generation are not tied to seasons but can occur simultaneously year round.

Nature

There are clear discrepancies between validating objective tools in a controlled-laboratory and free-living environments.

Sports Medicine - Open

Beyond the general picture, the correlations matrices of the three groups display clear discrepancies: it is unlikely that the assumption of homogeneous copulas could hold and support a preference for (hat {rho }_{boldsymbol {lambda }}).

Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Morrison quickly sent Stone a letter detailing clear-cut discrepancies that showed that he could not have been Perseus.

Los Angeles Times

The results show that there is a clear discrepancy between the preferences of the two consumer groups.

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

A clear discrepancy exists between this rate and the 0.1 m/ka estimated for the longer period since the end of the Pliocene.

Geomorphology

There is a clear discrepancy, says Sumikura, between the corporate drive to quickly turn research results into commercial applications, and the academic incentives to publish papers on basic research.

Nature

However, there is a clear discrepancy in the literature about their uptake mechanism, which should be related to the differences existing in the nanotube materials, as well as the experimental procedures.

Carbon

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "clear discrepancies", ensure that the differences you are highlighting are genuinely obvious and easily identifiable. Provide specific examples or data to support your claim for maximum impact.

Common error

Avoid using "clear discrepancies" when the differences are subtle or require detailed analysis to uncover. This can weaken your argument and make your writing seem less credible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clear discrepancies" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As affirmed by Ludwig, it highlights easily identifiable inconsistencies or differences.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

18%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "clear discrepancies" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to highlight obvious inconsistencies across various domains. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct. Its primary function is to emphasize easily noticeable differences, making it particularly useful in science, news, and formal business contexts. While alternatives like "obvious inconsistencies" or "glaring differences" exist, "clear discrepancies" maintains a level of formality and precision suitable for professional and academic writing. When using this phrase, ensure that the differences you're pointing out are genuinely apparent and backed by concrete evidence to strengthen your argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious inconsistencies

Replaces "discrepancies" with a direct synonym and emphasizes the lack of alignment.

glaring differences

Highlights that the differences are so obvious as to be hard to ignore.

unmistakable inconsistencies

Emphasizes that the inconsistencies are so clear that they cannot be mistaken.

evident contradictions

Focuses on conflicting elements, highlighting the presence of opposing statements or data.

patent discrepancies

Uses "patent" to mean readily visible or obvious, suggesting the discrepancies are easily seen.

plain disagreements

Simplifies the language to indicate a straightforward lack of agreement or alignment.

apparent conflicts

Suggests discrepancies that are immediately visible or understood without deep analysis.

marked divergences

Highlights significant deviations or differences between items or sets of data.

noticeable variations

Emphasizes easily observable differences, often in data or sets of results.

distinct disparities

Indicates a clear inequality or difference that stands out significantly.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "clear discrepancies" in a sentence?

To use "clear discrepancies" effectively, ensure you highlight differences that are easily noticeable. Follow up with specific data or examples to reinforce the visibility and importance of these inconsistencies.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "clear discrepancies"?

You can use alternatives like "obvious inconsistencies", "evident contradictions", or "glaring differences", depending on the specific nuances you want to convey.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use the phrase "clear discrepancies"?

The phrase "clear discrepancies" is particularly suited for contexts where you need to point out easily identifiable differences between sets of data, reports, or observations, such as in scientific studies, financial analyses, or investigative journalism.

What distinguishes "clear discrepancies" from simply stating "differences"?

"Clear discrepancies" emphasizes that the differences are not only present but also easily noticeable and significant. It suggests a level of obviousness that "differences" alone does not convey.