classifications with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "classifications with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing categories or types that are associated with something else, often in academic or technical contexts. Example: "The study included various classifications with respect to age, gender, and socioeconomic status."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He wants to replace degree classifications with a grade point average (GPA).

The Guardian

To be ready for upsets, Gitton keeps on the victory podium a chest of jerseys for all four classifications with each of the 21 teams' names.

The New York Times

Mr. Rendler said North Korea's government had stratified society into 51 different loyalty classifications, with foreign food and medical aid going to the most loyal.

The New York Times

The American Anthropological association argues that eventually, American society must replace racial classifications with some more accurate way of characterizing the diversity of the American people -- perhaps "ethnic group".

The New York Times

By James Thurber The New Yorker, February 24 , 1934P. 17 The great wines of France are divided into only three classifications with which we need to be concerned: The grand vins, the petites vins, and the vins fins.

The New Yorker

But as universities examine the possibility of replacing traditional degree classifications with Grade Point Average (GPA) – a new marking system where graduates receive a point score – the discussion is heating up.

The Guardian

Other events included qualifying and practice on Friday, and Saturday's American LeMans 100, in which several vehicle classifications with two-person crews raced simultaneously.

The New York Times - Sports

Descriptive study comparing MRI classifications with measurements from radiographs.

European Journal of Radiology

The multi-seasonal dataset produced the most accurate classifications, with an overall accuracy (OA) of 83.4%.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

The analyses involve descriptive statistics such as percentage correct classifications with corresponding mean confidence ratings.

European Transport Research Review

The identified variables related to high parasitism should be used for image classifications with a functional approach.

Basic and Applied Ecology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "classifications with", ensure the characteristic that links the classifications is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. For instance, "classifications with detailed categories".

Common error

Avoid using "classifications with" when intending to describe a simple list or enumeration. This phrase is better suited for contexts where the classifications inherently possess a shared attribute or characteristic. For example, don't say "Classifications with apples, bananas, and oranges"; instead, opt for "Classifications of fruits" or "Types of fruit, including apples, bananas, and oranges".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "classifications with" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun. It specifies that the preceding noun (usually another noun describing a system of categories) is associated with, or possesses, certain attributes or features, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "classifications with" is a grammatically sound prepositional phrase commonly used to specify attributes or features associated with a set of categories. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage across various contexts, especially in scientific and news media domains. While versatile, it's essential to ensure clarity in its application, avoiding redundancy or misuse in simpler enumerations. Related phrases like "categories including" or "types featuring" can offer nuanced alternatives. Remember to use it when you want to categorize items based on a shared feature.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

classifications that include

This version breaks up the original phrase to provide a more explicit and perhaps clearer construction.

classifications based on

This emphasizes the criteria or foundation upon which the classifications are made.

categories associated with

This uses "associated with" to describe the connection between the categories and their properties.

categories including

This alternative uses "including" to specify what the classifications contain, focusing on the content within the classification.

categories characterized by

This highlights the defining attributes of each classification, emphasizing unique features.

types featuring

This substitutes "classifications" with "types", and "with" with "featuring", which emphasizes prominent attributes.

groupings incorporating

This replaces "classifications" with "groupings", highlighting the act of bringing elements together, and uses "incorporating" to show inclusion.

groupings determined by

This phrase substitutes "classifications" for "groupings" while emphasizing that these groupings are defined by certain attributes.

divisions encompassing

This alternative uses "divisions" to denote a separation into distinct sets, and "encompassing" to indicate coverage or inclusion.

segments featuring

Here, "segments" replaces "classifications," focusing on a part or division, while "featuring" highlights a key aspect.

FAQs

How can I use "classifications with" in a sentence?

Use "classifications with" to describe categories that share a common attribute or feature. For example, "The study examined disease "classifications with" varying levels of severity."

What are some alternatives to "classifications with"?

Alternatives include "categories including", "types featuring", or "groupings incorporating" depending on the context.

Is "classifications with" grammatically correct?

Yes, "classifications with" is grammatically correct and commonly used in academic and scientific writing to describe categories that possess specific shared traits.

What's the difference between "classifications with" and "types of"?

"Classifications with" emphasizes a shared attribute among the classifications, while "types of" simply indicates different kinds within a broader category. For instance, ""classifications with" detailed categories" highlights the commonality of detailed categories across the classifications, whereas "types of categories" simply lists various category types.