clashes of facts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clashes of facts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe situations where different pieces of information or evidence contradict each other. Example: "The debate was intense, with numerous clashes of facts that left the audience confused about the truth."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In popular culture, arguments about evolution are not clashes of facts against stories.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Rather, it has been a clash of facts.

The New Yorker

The legacy of our CO2 emissions: a clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics.

Nature

Politicians and voters on the right and left not only hold different opinions from one another, but often can't even agree over a shared set of facts, as clashes over climate change, health care and the Iraq war attest.

The New York Times - Books

This clash of religion and facts has always been troublesome for me -- indeed, I would say that for the longest time it was the bane of my existence.

Huffington Post

"No clashes of schedule, no races overlapping".

The New York Times - Sports

Some clashes of pride.

Huffington Post

"clashes of culture … misunderstanding.

Disability and Rehabilitation

This has been an ongoing yet perplexing clash of egos, given the facts at hand, including the reality that although Sumner is the largest and controlling shareholder, he is also pushing 80. There's no question that this is a company he built, but it's also clear that he's not going to be around forever, no matter how hale and hearty he is right now.

Forbes

In this essay, I discuss non-beneficial treatments in light of these sorts of disputes, when there is a clash between the nominally secular world of fact- and evidence-based medicine and the faith-based world of hope for a miraculous cure.

Duke University

The problems for such principle-based theories include overgeneration, lack of determinacy, clashes, and the fact that speakers often have other goals.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "clashes of facts", ensure that you clearly identify the specific facts that are in conflict to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "clashes of facts" as a vague substitute for deeper analysis. Always specify the nature of the conflicting facts and their implications.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clashes of facts" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes situations where different pieces of information or evidence are in conflict. Ludwig AI validates this usage, confirming its correctness in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "clashes of facts" is a grammatically sound and relatively common phrase used to describe conflicting factual information. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and appropriate for use in written English. It is most often found in news, scientific, and academic contexts and serves to highlight discrepancies that warrant further investigation. When using the phrase, it is best to clearly specify the conflicting facts to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases include "conflicts of facts" and "factual discrepancies".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflicts of facts

Replaces "clashes" with "conflicts", maintaining the focus on contradictory factual information.

disagreement on facts

Emphasizes the differing opinions or conclusions drawn from the same set of facts.

factual contradictions

Highlights the existence of direct oppositions within the factual information.

contradictory evidence

Focuses on the evidence itself being in opposition.

factual discrepancies

Highlights the inconsistencies or variations in the presented facts.

conflicting data

Uses the term "data" to denote the factual information that is in conflict.

inconsistent information

Focuses on the lack of uniformity or agreement in the information presented.

opposing factual accounts

Highlights different versions or narratives of the same events based on conflicting facts.

contested facts

Suggests that the facts in question are disputed or challenged.

divergent factual claims

Highlights claims that differ from accepted reality.

FAQs

How can I use "clashes of facts" in a sentence?

You can use "clashes of facts" to describe situations where different pieces of information or evidence contradict each other, leading to confusion or debate. For example: "The investigation revealed several "clashes of facts" that complicated the case".

What's a good alternative to "clashes of facts"?

Alternatives include "conflicts of facts", "factual discrepancies", or "contradictory evidence", depending on the specific context.

Is "clashes of facts" grammatically correct?

Yes, "clashes of facts" is grammatically correct. It functions as a noun phrase describing conflicting pieces of information.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "clashes of facts"?

"Clashes of facts" is appropriate in contexts where you want to highlight disagreements or contradictions in factual information, often in discussions of politics, science, or history.