clashed with each other

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clashed with each other" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where two or more parties are in conflict or disagreement. Example: "The two teams clashed with each other during the championship game, resulting in a heated rivalry."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

Mr. Giuliani has stood on the sidelines recently as Mr. Romney and Mr. McCain have clashed with each other.

The New York Times

It was therefore simply a matter of time before these two great civilizations, which have such conflicting ideologies, clashed with each other in some catastrophic way.

The Guardian - Books

At least 15 people were killed Monday and another 30 wounded after government forces clashed with each other in Mogadishu, witnesses said.

The New York Times

In the south, Touareg and Toubou tribal paramilitaries control territories adjacent to the Niger and Chad borders and have clashed with each other.

Independent

Yet in the past few months, as the government geared up for a major offensive, the two groups openly clashed with each other.

The New York Times

For the most part, he shunned the use of force, even when rebellious Soviet republics clashed with each other, as Armenia and Azerbaijan did over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, or when they moved toward independence.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

You have several objectives that can clash with each other.

The New York Times

Obviously these two approaches are bound to clash with each other.

The Guardian - Opinion

"There is the humanitarian concept and the political concept and they clash with each other," he said.

The New Yorker

"There is the humanitarian concept and the political concept — and they clash with each other," he said.

The New Yorker

This is a civil war, where the interests of two parts of Ukraine that consider themselves linked to two cultural traditions are clashing with each other".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing conflicts, use "clashed with each other" to clearly convey a direct confrontation or opposition between two or more parties. It's most effective when highlighting a specific instance of disagreement or struggle.

Common error

While "clashed with each other" is acceptable in news and general writing, it might sound too informal or sensational for academic or formal business reports. Opt for more neutral alternatives like "disagreed" or "were in conflict" in those settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clashed with each other" functions primarily as a verb phrase indicating a state of conflict or opposition between two or more entities. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase is used to describe direct confrontations, disagreements, or struggles between parties. Ludwig's examples span diverse contexts, illustrating the phrase's versatility.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "clashed with each other" is a commonly used phrase to describe situations of conflict or opposition. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and versatile, appearing most frequently in news and media contexts. While generally neutral in register, it may be perceived as too informal for academic writing, where alternatives like "disagreed" or "were in conflict" might be more suitable. Be mindful of the context and intended formality when choosing between "clashed with each other" and its alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were in conflict

Emphasizes the state of being in opposition, focusing on the ongoing nature of the disagreement. Replaces the verb 'clashed' with a more general term.

were at odds

Highlights the disagreement and lack of harmony between parties. Substitutes "clashed with" with a common idiom.

were in disagreement

A more formal and direct way of expressing the conflict. Replaces 'clashed' with a noun phrase.

locked horns

An idiomatic expression suggesting a direct and intense confrontation. It uses a more figurative and vivid language.

collided

Focuses on the moment of impact or confrontation. This is less about an ongoing state and more about a specific event.

opposed each other

Highlights the act of resistance or antagonism between entities. It emphasizes active opposition.

were antagonistic

Emphasizes the mutual hostility and active opposition. It focuses on the state of animosity.

differed sharply

Indicates a significant divergence in opinion or stance. This focuses on the difference rather than the confrontation.

disagreed vehemently

Emphasizes the intensity and passion behind the disagreement. It adds emotional weight to the statement.

contended

Implies a struggle or competition, often in a verbal sense. It suggests an ongoing effort to assert a position.

FAQs

How can I use "clashed with each other" in a sentence?

You can use "clashed with each other" to describe situations where two or more parties are in direct conflict or opposition. For example, "The protesters "clashed with each other" during the demonstration".

What are some alternatives to "clashed with each other"?

Alternatives include phrases like "were in conflict", "were at odds", or "were in disagreement", which offer varying degrees of formality and intensity.

Is "clashed with one another" interchangeable with "clashed with each other"?

Yes, "clashed with one another" is generally interchangeable with ""clashed with each other"". The choice often depends on stylistic preference, although "each other" is slightly more common.

In what contexts is it best to avoid using "clashed with each other"?

While usable in general writing, avoid ""clashed with each other"" in highly formal or academic contexts, where more neutral language is preferred. Consider options like "differed" or "were antagonistic" instead.