cited in

USAGE SUMMARY

"cited in" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used when referring to a source that was previously mentioned. For example, "The author noted that the study was 'inconclusive' (cited in Smith, 2020)."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Six have been cited in the playoffs.

The New York Times - Sports

The numbers were cited in parliament.

The Guardian

Previous, smaller studies, cited in the N.Y.U.

The New York Times

From "WHO data cited in UNICEF, 2009".

International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy

aSource: MAR 1927, cited in (Sindiga 1984).

Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice

18. See all works cited in bibliography.

SEP

(Paul, 1995 cited in Jacobs and Farrell 2003 p.18).

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

(Watson and Juengst 1992, cited in Juengst 1996: 67).

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

(Jean-Baptiste Robinet 1768, cited in Lovejoy 1936).

Evolution: Education and Outreach

This is a result frequently cited in the literature.

Health Economics Review

Some examples can be cited in Ethiopia and elsewhere.

Ecological Processes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cited in", ensure that the original source is accurately represented and that the context of the citation is clear to the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "cited in" without providing sufficient context about why the source is relevant or important to your argument. Always explain the significance of the citation to enhance clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cited in" functions as a prepositional phrase used to indicate the origin or source of information, data, or ideas. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the prepositional phrase "cited in" is grammatically correct and commonly used to indicate the source of information across various domains. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is most prevalent in scientific and news-related contexts, reflecting its importance in academic and journalistic writing. When using this phrase, ensure accurate representation of the original source and provide clear context. Alternatives such as "referenced in" or "mentioned in" can be employed to add variety to your writing. Remember to avoid overuse without proper context to maintain clarity and credibility. Using the phrase accurately enhances transparency and strengthens your arguments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

referenced in

This alternative implies a direct and explicit mention of a source.

mentioned in

This alternative suggests a less formal or detailed reference.

detailed in

This alternative emphasizes that comprehensive information is available in the specified source.

documented in

This alternative highlights that the information has been officially recorded in the source.

found in

This alternative indicates that the information exists within the source, without necessarily implying citation.

presented in

This alternative suggests that the information was formally introduced or displayed in the source.

reported in

This alternative emphasizes that the information was officially disclosed or communicated in the source.

indicated in

This alternative suggests that the information was pointed out or suggested in the source.

described in

This alternative highlights the information was thoroughly explained in the source.

stated in

This alternative means that information was expressed clearly in the source.

FAQs

How do I properly use "cited in" in a sentence?

Use "cited in" to indicate the source where information or an idea originally appeared. For example, "The data was initially reported by Smith (2010), and subsequently "cited in" Jones (2015)."

What are some alternatives to "cited in" that I can use?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "referenced in", "mentioned in", or "documented in" to vary your writing.

Is there a difference between "cited in" and "referenced in"?

"Cited in" generally implies a direct mention or quotation of a source, while "referenced in" can include broader allusions or connections to the source material.

Can I use "cited in" to refer to personal communications?

While you can technically use ""cited in"" for personal communications, it's more common to use phrases like "according to" or "in a personal communication with" for such references.