checks for errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "checks for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of identifying mistakes or inaccuracies in a document, code, or any other form of work. Example: "The software automatically checks for errors before finalizing the report."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Once the message is transcribed, the company checks for errors and returns it to the caller via e-mail.

The New York Times - Tech

The system even checks for errors — and instructs users how to correct them before any shock is delivered.

The New York Times

She adds supporting documentation, checks for errors, kicks out exceptions, and adds validated information to the official market repository.

Harvard Business Review

It has been improved in many ways, but the way in which the protocol breaks information into packets and then checks for errors in their transmission is still recognisable.Dr Metcalfe did not make money from the actual invention of Ethernet.

The Economist

TaxCut then checks for errors and omissions and provides a summary of your return.

Forbes

Grants.gov also checks for errors in the form SF424 (R&R).

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Manpower is employed mostly to check for errors.

The New York Times

A computer algorithm has been developed to check for errors of Types 2 and 3 above.

Harvard Business Review

But what if checking for errors could be made interesting enough for volunteers to do it?

Harvard University

The computational basis was checked for errors when used for solving a quantum algorithm.

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

During real-time ground contacts with the APL ground station, downlinked files are checked for errors.

Acta Astronautica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing technical documentation, clearly state what specific types of errors your system or process "checks for errors". For instance, specify if you're "checking for errors" in syntax, data types, or logic.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "checks for errors" without context. Always specify the type of errors being checked, as it adds clarity and precision to your writing. Instead of saying "The system checks for errors", specify, "The system checks for syntax errors and logical inconsistencies."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "checks for errors" functions as a verbal phrase that describes an action performed to identify inaccuracies or mistakes. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is commonly found across various types of texts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "checks for errors" is a grammatically correct and commonly used verbal phrase that describes the process of identifying inaccuracies or mistakes. Ludwig AI confirms its applicability across various contexts, particularly in scientific, news, and business writing. While versatile, ensure to specify the type of errors being checked for clarity. Consider using alternatives like "verifies for accuracy" or "inspects for mistakes" for variety or formality. Remember, effective communication involves precise language, so provide context when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verifies for accuracy

This alternative emphasizes confirming the correctness and precision of something.

inspects for mistakes

This alternative highlights a careful and detailed examination to find faults.

examines for inaccuracies

This alternative focuses on looking for and identifying things that are not exact or correct.

reviews for discrepancies

This alternative highlights looking for inconsistencies or differences that should not exist.

audits for faults

This alternative refers to an official examination of records or accounts to identify defects.

scrutinizes for oversights

This alternative suggests a very thorough and critical examination to find things that have been missed.

assesses for defects

This alternative emphasizes evaluating something to find flaws or imperfections.

validates for correctness

This alternative underscores the process of confirming that something is true and accurate.

probes for inconsistencies

This alternative refers to investigating in order to find issues.

debugs for anomalies

This alternative, commonly used in technical contexts, means to identify and remove errors from a system or code and emphasizes identifying deviations from the norm.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "checks for errors" to sound more formal?

In formal contexts, you can replace "checks for errors" with phrases like "verifies accuracy", "inspects for defects", or "audits for discrepancies".

What is the difference between "checks for errors" and "error correction"?

"Checks for errors" refers to the process of identifying mistakes, while "error correction" involves fixing those identified mistakes. The former is detection, the latter is remediation.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the phrase "checks for errors"?

The phrase "checks for errors" is suitable in various contexts, including software development, data analysis, quality control, and general writing. It's applicable whenever a process of identifying mistakes or inaccuracies is involved.

What are some common methods used when someone "checks for errors"?

Methods for "checking for errors" include manual review, automated testing, double data entry, and using specialized software to identify inconsistencies or deviations from expected results.