Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
checked for omissions
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "checked for omissions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of reviewing something to ensure that nothing has been left out or overlooked. Example: "Before finalizing the report, it was checked for omissions to ensure all necessary information was included."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Formal & Business
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
Reference lists of retrieved articles and previous relevant reviews were also checked for omissions (Hodgson and Darnton, 2000; Boffetta, 2007).
Science
Data will be checked for omissions and outliers to identify potential data entry errors and these will be clarified with the data enterer.
Data entered by the participant using the online software program Clinical Intelligence is automatically checked for omissions and outliers to identify potential data entry errors.
Science
Survey responses were recorded on paper at the homes of the participants, checked for omissions and incorrect data entry by the supervisors and coordinators, and sent weekly to be reviewed and numerically coded by the local Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) research team.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Quantitative data was checked for completeness and omissions before analysis to avoid error in analysis.
Science
All extracted data were then checked for accuracy and omissions by a non-blinded second author (SDJ).
Science
After development by five authors (JH, CJ, MT, CH and JWLC) the survey was checked for relevance and omissions by authors in all countries, pilot tested by 30 primary care clinicians in the UK and adjusted accordingly.
Science
Then, according to the protocol, a trained nurse checked it for omissions and inconsistencies.
Recorded interviews were transcribed by SF and each transcript was checked for any errors or omissions.
Science
The data is then checked for outliers, errors and omissions and cleaned.
Science
The data set was checked for logical inconsistencies, illegal codes, omissions and improbabilities by tabulating, summarising, describing and plotting variables.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "checked for omissions" in technical writing, explicitly state the criteria against which the check is performed to enhance clarity and ensure the reader understands the scope of the review.
Common error
Avoid using "checked for omissions" without specifying what constitutes a complete set of information. This can lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistent results. Always define clear criteria for what should be included.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "checked for omissions" functions as a passive construction describing an action performed on something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and suitable for use in English writing. The examples show its application in diverse fields, such as data analysis and survey review.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
15%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "checked for omissions" is a grammatically sound and usable expression for describing the act of reviewing something to ensure nothing has been left out, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While not exceedingly common, it is frequently employed in scientific and professional contexts, emphasizing a commitment to thoroughness. When using this phrase, it is beneficial to specify the criteria for what constitutes a complete set of information to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases like "verified for completeness" or "assessed for gaps" can be used to convey similar meanings, depending on the specific nuance desired.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
checked for accuracy and completeness
Expands the review to include both the correctness and the presence of all necessary information, making it a broader verification process.
verified for completeness
Emphasizes ensuring all required parts are present, shifting the focus from potential absence to confirmed inclusion.
examined for missing data
Specifically targets the lack of required information, particularly in research or reporting contexts.
reviewed for oversights
Highlights the act of looking back to catch mistakes, suggesting a careful re-examination process.
screened for absent information
Focuses on filtering out incomplete or lacking data, usually within a larger dataset or pool of information.
audited for incompleteness
Implies a formal inspection to identify any parts that are not fully present or fulfilled, often in compliance or financial settings.
validated for integrity
Suggests confirming the correctness and completeness of something, often in data or systems where reliability is crucial.
assessed for gaps
Focuses on identifying missing elements or areas that need further development, often used in planning or evaluation.
evaluated for thoroughness
Emphasizes judging how comprehensively something has been done, highlighting the degree of detail and inclusion.
inspected for deficiencies
Highlights a search for lacking aspects or flaws needing correction, common in quality control or safety checks.
FAQs
How can I use "checked for omissions" in a sentence?
You can use "checked for omissions" to describe a process of reviewing data, documents, or other content to ensure nothing is missing. For example, "The report was carefully "checked for omissions" before submission".
What is a good alternative to "checked for omissions"?
Alternatives include "verified for completeness", "reviewed for oversights", or "assessed for gaps". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.
What does it mean to say something was "checked for omissions"?
It means a review was conducted to identify if any necessary parts or information were left out. It's a quality control step to ensure thoroughness and accuracy.
Is "checked for omissions" formal or informal language?
"Checked for omissions" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its appropriateness depends more on the surrounding vocabulary and the overall tone of the communication.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested