Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

checked for omissions

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "checked for omissions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of reviewing something to ensure that nothing has been left out or overlooked. Example: "Before finalizing the report, it was checked for omissions to ensure all necessary information was included."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Reference lists of retrieved articles and previous relevant reviews were also checked for omissions (Hodgson and Darnton, 2000; Boffetta, 2007).

Data will be checked for omissions and outliers to identify potential data entry errors and these will be clarified with the data enterer.

Data entered by the participant using the online software program Clinical Intelligence is automatically checked for omissions and outliers to identify potential data entry errors.

Science

BMJ Open

Survey responses were recorded on paper at the homes of the participants, checked for omissions and incorrect data entry by the supervisors and coordinators, and sent weekly to be reviewed and numerically coded by the local Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) research team.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Quantitative data was checked for completeness and omissions before analysis to avoid error in analysis.

All extracted data were then checked for accuracy and omissions by a non-blinded second author (SDJ).

Science

BMJ Open

After development by five authors (JH, CJ, MT, CH and JWLC) the survey was checked for relevance and omissions by authors in all countries, pilot tested by 30 primary care clinicians in the UK and adjusted accordingly.

Science

BMJ Open

Then, according to the protocol, a trained nurse checked it for omissions and inconsistencies.

Recorded interviews were transcribed by SF and each transcript was checked for any errors or omissions.

The data is then checked for outliers, errors and omissions and cleaned.

Science

BMC Cancer

The data set was checked for logical inconsistencies, illegal codes, omissions and improbabilities by tabulating, summarising, describing and plotting variables.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "checked for omissions" in technical writing, explicitly state the criteria against which the check is performed to enhance clarity and ensure the reader understands the scope of the review.

Common error

Avoid using "checked for omissions" without specifying what constitutes a complete set of information. This can lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistent results. Always define clear criteria for what should be included.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "checked for omissions" functions as a passive construction describing an action performed on something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and suitable for use in English writing. The examples show its application in diverse fields, such as data analysis and survey review.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "checked for omissions" is a grammatically sound and usable expression for describing the act of reviewing something to ensure nothing has been left out, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While not exceedingly common, it is frequently employed in scientific and professional contexts, emphasizing a commitment to thoroughness. When using this phrase, it is beneficial to specify the criteria for what constitutes a complete set of information to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases like "verified for completeness" or "assessed for gaps" can be used to convey similar meanings, depending on the specific nuance desired.

More alternative expressions(10)

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

FAQs

How can I use "checked for omissions" in a sentence?

You can use "checked for omissions" to describe a process of reviewing data, documents, or other content to ensure nothing is missing. For example, "The report was carefully "checked for omissions" before submission".

What is a good alternative to "checked for omissions"?

Alternatives include "verified for completeness", "reviewed for oversights", or "assessed for gaps". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

What does it mean to say something was "checked for omissions"?

It means a review was conducted to identify if any necessary parts or information were left out. It's a quality control step to ensure thoroughness and accuracy.

Is "checked for omissions" formal or informal language?

"Checked for omissions" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its appropriateness depends more on the surrounding vocabulary and the overall tone of the communication.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: