checked for deviations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "checked for deviations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are verifying or inspecting something to identify any differences or anomalies from a standard or expected outcome. Example: "The final report was thoroughly checked for deviations from the original plan to ensure compliance with the project requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

They were checked for deviations from the norm, which may indicate clogging of the nanochannel arrays.

Nature

Then they took the first digits from all the numbers, and checked for deviations from what you would predict, using Benford's law.

The Guardian - Opinion

Loci were first checked for deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in CERVUS 3.0 [31] (Table 1).

Plosone

We checked for deviations from normality with Kolmogorov Smirnov tests.

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Plasma metabolites were checked for deviations from a normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test [ 19].

Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring

Genotype distributions were checked for deviations of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).

BMC Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

All genotype data were checked for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using http://ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl.

Plosone

Data were checked for deviation from a normal distribution using an Anderson-Darling test.

BMC Veterinary Research

Genotypes were checked for deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the Pearson X test.

BMC Cancer

The genotype data were checked for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using a previously described method [ 18].

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Genotypes were checked for deviation from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium using the hwsnp function implemented in Stata (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas).

Cancer Causes and Control

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "checked for deviations", ensure the context clearly defines the expected norm or standard from which deviations are being assessed. This provides clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "checked for deviations" in casual conversation. Opt for simpler phrases like "looked for differences" or "made sure everything was okay" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "checked for deviations" functions as a verb phrase, indicating an action performed on a subject to identify any departures from an established norm or standard. As per Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Examples from Ludwig show it frequently used in contexts requiring verification.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

76%

Academia

12%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "checked for deviations" is a grammatically correct phrase commonly used in formal and scientific contexts to describe the act of verifying something against a standard to identify any departures. As highlighted by Ludwig, it is a usable phrase in written English, primarily appearing in science, academia, and news contexts. While effective in these settings, it may sound out of place in more informal conversations, where simpler alternatives are preferred. Remember to clearly define the standard when using this phrase to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inspected for anomalies

Replaces "deviations" with "anomalies", emphasizing irregularities or abnormalities.

verified for irregularities

Uses "verified" instead of "checked", suggesting a more formal confirmation process and replaces "deviations" with "irregularities".

assessed for variations

Replaces "checked" with "assessed", indicating a more in-depth evaluation and replaces "deviations" with "variations".

examined for differences

Uses "examined" to denote a closer look and replaces "deviations" with "differences", focusing on disparities.

screened for discrepancies

Employs "screened" indicating a filtering process and replaces "deviations" with "discrepancies", highlighting inconsistencies.

evaluated for abnormalities

Replaces "checked" with "evaluated", suggesting a judgment of value, and replaces "deviations" with "abnormalities".

investigated for nonconformities

"Investigated" implies a detailed inquiry, while "nonconformities" replaces "deviations" to stress a failure to adhere to standards.

audited for variances

"Audited" suggests a formal inspection, and "variances" replaces "deviations" to focus on statistical differences.

reviewed for exceptions

"Reviewed" indicates a careful examination, while "exceptions" replaces "deviations" to highlight items that don't fit the norm.

tested for divergences

"Tested" implies a procedure to determine characteristics, and "divergences" replaces "deviations" to focus on diverging from a set path or standard.

FAQs

How can I use "checked for deviations" in a sentence?

Use "checked for deviations" to indicate a process of verifying something against a standard or norm. For example, "The data was "checked for deviations" from the expected results".

What is a good alternative to "checked for deviations"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "inspected for anomalies", "verified for irregularities", or "examined for differences".

Is "checked for deviations" formal or informal?

"Checked for deviations" leans towards a more formal register. It's suitable for professional, academic, or technical contexts rather than casual conversation.

What's the difference between "checked for errors" and "checked for deviations"?

"Checked for errors" implies looking for mistakes or inaccuracies, while ""checked for deviations"" suggests comparing against a standard or expected outcome to identify differences, which may not necessarily be errors.