Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
checked for completeness
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "checked for completeness" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used when referring to reviewing a document or piece of writing to ensure that all necessary information is included and there are no missing elements. Example: Before submitting the report, the team checked it for completeness to make sure all data and details were accurately presented.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
All the completed questionnaires were checked for completeness and consistency.
Science
The completed questionnaires were checked for completeness and consistency by the investigators.
Science
Completed questionnaires were checked for completeness and consistency by data collection supervisors.
Science
All completed interview sheets were checked for completeness by the first author.
Participants completed a machine-readable questionnaire that was checked for completeness and validity.
Science
The questionnaire was completed in privacy with no time limit and was checked for completeness.
Science
The entire collection of coins was checked for completeness of inventory and condition of preservation.
Academia
Double data entry procedure was adopted and digitized data were checked for completeness and consistency.
Science
Data was checked for completeness.
Science
Questionnaires were checked for completeness on return.
Data were checked for completeness and accuracy.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "checked for completeness", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being checked (e.g., documents, data, inventory).
Common error
Avoid using "checked for completeness" without specifying what exactly was checked. Always provide context to ensure clarity. For example, say "The report was checked for completeness", not just "It was checked for completeness".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "checked for completeness" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that a review process has been performed to ensure nothing is missing. According to Ludwig, this phrase is correct and commonly used. Examples show it applying to data, questionnaires, and other forms of information.
Frequent in
Science
98%
Academia
1%
Formal & Business
1%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "checked for completeness" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the process of ensuring that something is thorough and contains all necessary elements. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage. It's frequently found in scientific and academic contexts, emphasizing the meticulous nature of research and documentation. When using the phrase, be clear about what is being checked. Alternatives such as "verified for completeness" and "inspected for completeness" can provide subtle variations in meaning, but the core concept remains consistent: ensuring thoroughness and the absence of omissions.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
verified for completeness
Replaces "checked" with "verified", emphasizing the confirmation aspect.
inspected for completeness
Substitutes "checked" with "inspected", suggesting a more detailed examination.
examined for completeness
Uses "examined" instead of "checked", implying a closer scrutiny.
reviewed for completeness
Replaces "checked" with "reviewed", focusing on the process of going through something again.
assessed for completeness
Substitutes "checked" with "assessed", indicating an evaluation of the degree of completeness.
evaluated for completeness
Uses "evaluated" to highlight the assessment aspect of the process.
ensure thoroughness
Changes the structure to a verb phrase emphasizing the outcome of being thorough.
confirm that it is complete
Focuses on confirming the state of being complete, rather than the act of checking.
validate completeness
Uses the more formal term "validate", which suggests verifying authenticity.
ascertain completeness
Replaces "checked" with "ascertain", implying an effort to find something out for certain.
FAQs
How can I use "checked for completeness" in a sentence?
You can use "checked for completeness" to indicate that something has been reviewed to ensure nothing is missing, as in "The data set was "checked for completeness" before analysis".
What does "checked for completeness" mean?
"Checked for completeness" means that something has been examined to make sure all the necessary parts or information are included and nothing is missing.
What is a formal alternative to "checked for completeness"?
In formal contexts, you could use alternatives such as "verified for completeness" or "inspected for completeness" to maintain a professional tone.
Is it redundant to say "checked for completeness and accuracy"?
While "completeness" and "accuracy" are related, they are distinct concepts. Checking for completeness ensures all necessary information is present, while checking for accuracy ensures the information is correct. Therefore, saying "checked for completeness and accuracy" is not necessarily redundant, as it covers both aspects.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested