Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
checked for aberrations
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "checked for aberrations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are verifying or inspecting something for irregularities or deviations from the norm. Example: "The data was thoroughly checked for aberrations before the final analysis was conducted."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Therefore, test species will be checked for pathomorphoses and histopathological aberrations of target organs (e.g., sexual glands, gonads, midgut gland) during exposure.
It's impossible to check for noise, chromatic aberration, distortion, blending and so on.
News & Media
and checked for errors.
Science
After inserting the laparoscope, visual inspection is intended to check for iatrogenic injuries and intraperitoneal aberrations.
Science
As loss of RAB21 in the tumor would induce chromosome number aberrations, we checked the nucleus aberration in miR-183/-96/-182 cluster overexpression MCF-7 cells.
Science
Check, check, check for Ms. Sandberg.
News & Media
Checking for pursuers.
News & Media
Check for soap suds.
News & Media
Check for job completion.
Science
Check for passaging.
Check for pellet.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "checked for aberrations", ensure the context clearly defines what constitutes an "aberration" to avoid ambiguity. Consider specifying the expected norm or standard.
Common error
Avoid using "checked for aberrations" in casual or non-technical writing. Opt for simpler terms like "looked for problems" or "examined for issues" to maintain clarity and appropriateness.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "checked for aberrations" functions primarily as a predicate in a sentence, indicating an action performed on a subject. As Ludwig AI suggests, it implies a process of verifying or inspecting something for irregularities or deviations.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "checked for aberrations" is a grammatically sound expression used to describe the process of examining something for irregularities. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is suitable for use in various contexts where verification and inspection are necessary. Although it is not extremely frequent, its clarity and precision make it valuable in scientific, technical, and formal writing. Remember to consider the audience and context when using this phrase, and be prepared to use simpler alternatives in more casual settings.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
inspected for anomalies
Replaces "checked" with "inspected" and "aberrations" with the more general term "anomalies".
examined for irregularities
Substitutes "checked" with "examined" and "aberrations" with "irregularities", focusing on deviations from a regular pattern.
verified for deviations
Replaces "checked" with "verified" and "aberrations" with "deviations", emphasizing a confirmation of standard behavior.
screened for abnormalities
Uses "screened" to suggest a systematic check and replaces "aberrations" with "abnormalities", implying a departure from the norm.
assessed for variations
Replaces "checked" with "assessed" and "aberrations" with "variations", suggesting a focus on differences from a standard.
evaluated for anomalies
Similar to "inspected for anomalies", but uses "evaluated" to suggest a more thorough assessment.
looked for deviations
A more informal phrasing, replacing "checked" with "looked for" while retaining "deviations".
investigated for irregularities
Replaces "checked" with "investigated", suggesting a more in-depth examination of irregularities.
monitored for anomalies
Uses "monitored" to indicate an ongoing check for anomalies over a period of time.
audited for discrepancies
Employs "audited" to suggest a formal and systematic review for discrepancies, often in a financial or compliance context.
FAQs
What does "checked for aberrations" mean?
The phrase "checked for aberrations" means that something has been examined carefully to identify any deviations or irregularities from what is considered normal or standard. It's commonly used in technical, scientific, or medical contexts.
How can I use "checked for aberrations" in a sentence?
You can use "checked for aberrations" in sentences like: "The data was "checked for aberrations" before the final analysis.", or "The equipment was "checked for aberrations" to ensure proper functioning."
What are some alternatives to "checked for aberrations"?
Alternatives to "checked for aberrations" include "inspected for anomalies", "examined for irregularities", or "verified for deviations", depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.
In what fields is the phrase "checked for aberrations" commonly used?
The phrase "checked for aberrations" is commonly used in fields such as biology, medicine, engineering, and data analysis, where identifying deviations from expected norms is crucial.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested