Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
check for any errors
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"check for any errors" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to remind someone to look for mistakes in their work. For example, "Before you submit your work, be sure to check for any errors."
✓ Grammatically correct
Academia
Wiki
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
6 human-written examples
Review the form your submitting and check for any errors or missed fields.
Academia
The PI should check for any errors, especially in era Commons, after submission.
Academia
Once an article has been typeset, the author will receive one (1) set of proofs to check for any errors (by either the author or the typesetter).
Academia
After each experiment, each MRAC was visually inspected in order to check for any errors in tissue classification such as fat/water tissue inversion, which can influence the linear attenuation coefficients applied to the PET emission data [25].
Science
Check for any errors.
Wiki
The draft: This is the time to check for any errors in the paper.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
Recorded interviews were transcribed by SF and each transcript was checked for any errors or omissions.
Science
There is a website/tool called W3C Validator at http://validator.w3.org/ which checks for any errors.
Wiki
Double check for any spelling errors or typing errors.
Wiki
Check again for any errors, and adjust as needed.
News & Media
Check carefully for any errors on font size, spacing or alignment.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always "check for any errors" immediately after completing a task, while the details are still fresh in your mind. This increases the likelihood of catching mistakes.
Common error
Don't disregard minor errors such as typos or formatting issues. These small mistakes can detract from the overall quality and credibility of your work. Always "check for any errors", no matter how insignificant they may seem.
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "check for any errors" functions as an imperative, typically used to advise or instruct someone to review something carefully. Ludwig examples show usage in academic submissions, website development, and general writing contexts.
Frequent in
Wiki
28%
Science
25%
News & Media
22%
Less common in
Academia
19%
Formal & Business
6%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "check for any errors" is a common and correct imperative used to instruct someone to carefully review their work for mistakes. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It is versatile, appearing in academic, scientific, news, and informal contexts. When you want to remind someone to look for mistakes in their work, the phrase "check for any errors" will do. Related phrases include "verify for mistakes" and "examine for inaccuracies". Remember to be thorough and not overlook even seemingly minor issues to ensure high-quality results.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
double-check for mistakes
Adds emphasis on the checking process, ensuring thoroughness.
verify for mistakes
Replaces "check" with "verify" and "errors" with "mistakes", providing a slightly more formal tone.
examine for inaccuracies
Substitutes "check" with "examine" and "errors" with "inaccuracies", suggesting a more detailed inspection.
inspect for flaws
Replaces "check" with "inspect" and "errors" with "flaws", implying a search for imperfections.
review for faults
Substitutes "check" with "review" and "errors" with "faults", suggesting a more systematic assessment.
proofread for mistakes
Specifically focuses on correcting written errors; "proofread" clarifies the context.
scan for defects
Replaces "check" with "scan", and "errors" with "defects", which is more appropriate in technical contexts.
validate for problems
Replaces "check" with "validate" and "errors" with "problems", which is more appropriate in contexts where confirming validity is key.
assess for discrepancies
Substitutes "check" with "assess" and "errors" with "discrepancies", offering a more analytical tone.
ensure there are no errors
Rephrases the request as an assurance check, changing the sentence structure.
FAQs
How can I use "check for any errors" in a sentence?
You can use "check for any errors" to advise someone to carefully review their work. For example: "Before submitting the report, please "check for any errors"".
What's an alternative to "check for any errors"?
Alternatives include "verify for mistakes", "examine for inaccuracies", or "inspect for flaws". The best choice depends on the context and the level of formality required.
Is it better to say "check for errors" or "check for mistakes"?
Both "check for errors" and "check for mistakes" are correct and widely used. The choice often depends on personal preference, although "errors" might be perceived as slightly more formal.
What types of errors should I be checking for?
You should "check for any errors" including grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, punctuation errors, factual inaccuracies, formatting inconsistencies, and logical flaws.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested