charges of fraud

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "charges of fraud" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to refer to accusations or allegations of fraudulent activity against an individual or entity. Example: "The company is facing serious charges of fraud related to its financial practices."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Tymoshenko is facing separate charges of fraud and tax evasion.

The Guardian

He never addressed any of the specific charges of fraud.

The New York Times

Officials continued to reject the charges of fraud.

The Guardian

They are awaiting trial on charges of fraud and treason.

The Guardian - Sport

Ms. Goodman said that the charges of fraud were baseless.

The New York Times

Why do you think Goldman got off so easily from such serious charges of fraud?

University of California, Berkeley

Prosecutors have laid charges of fraud and tax evasion against him.

The Economist

Mr. Starr pleaded guilty in September to charges of fraud and money laundering.

The New York Times

The Democrat party, Thailand's oldest, was cleared of charges of fraud.

The Economist

The Justice Department has opened a nationwide investigation into charges of fraud against Acorn.

The New York Times

He is already wanted by Russian authorities on charges of fraud and tax evasion.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "charges of fraud", clearly specify the entity or individual facing the charges to avoid ambiguity. For example: "The company is facing charges of fraud".

Common error

Avoid using "charge of fraud" when you mean to say someone is being formally accused. Instead, use "charges of fraud" to indicate multiple accusations or the overall legal situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "charges of fraud" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes the formal accusations made against an individual or entity concerning fraudulent activities. As shown by Ludwig, the expression is typically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "charges of fraud" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to denote formal accusations of fraudulent activities. Ludwig confirms its correctness and wide applicability across various domains, especially in News & Media and Academia. Related phrases include "fraud allegations" and "fraud accusations", providing alternative ways to express similar concepts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who faces the charges. Understanding its usage and communicative purpose will enhance precision in both writing and comprehension.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Fraud allegations

Focuses on the allegations themselves, rather than the formal charges.

Fraud accusations

Similar to allegations, emphasizing the act of accusing someone of fraud.

Fraudulent charges

Adjective is placed before the word, but the meaning is the same.

Fraud claims

Broader term that can include both formal charges and less formal accusations.

Fraud case

Refers to the legal case or matter involving fraud.

Fraud prosecution

Focuses specifically on the legal process of prosecuting someone for fraud.

Indictment for fraud

Highlights the formal act of being indicted for fraud.

Fraudulent schemes

More specific, refers to organized plans involving fraud.

Fraud offenses

Broader term that encompasses various types of fraud-related offenses.

Allegations of financial misconduct

More general and may encompass a broader range of financial improprieties beyond just fraud.

FAQs

How to use "charges of fraud" in a sentence?

Use "charges of fraud" to indicate that someone is accused of fraudulent activities. For example: "He is facing "charges of fraud" and tax evasion".

What can I say instead of "charges of fraud"?

You can use alternatives like "fraud allegations", "fraud accusations", or "fraud claims" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "charge of fraud" or "charges of fraud"?

"Charge of fraud" is typically incorrect when referring to multiple accusations or a general situation. The correct form is ""charges of fraud"", indicating multiple accusations or the overall legal issue.

What's the difference between "charges of fraud" and "allegations of fraud"?

"Charges of fraud" typically implies a more formal accusation within a legal setting. "Allegations of fraud" is a broader term that can refer to any claim or assertion of fraudulent activity, whether or not it has been formally charged.