charged with the

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "charged with the" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that someone has been assigned a specific responsibility or duty, often in a legal or formal context. Example: "She was charged with the responsibility of overseeing the project from start to finish."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Sabathia was not charged with the loss.

The New York Times - Sports

Innkeepers were charged with the same liability.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Both were charged with the December robberies.

The New York Times

He was not charged with the offence.

The Guardian

Palermo was charged with the hit.

The New Yorker

Butterfield was charged with the installation.

The New Yorker

Easton Woodhead, 19, has been charged with the murder.

Independent

Bob, being a gardener, had been charged with the task.

The New Yorker

So far no one has been charged with the murder.

The New York Times

Slager has now been charged with the murder of Scott.

Independent

No one was ever charged with the Claudy attack.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "charged with the" when you want to specifically indicate that someone has been formally accused of a crime or given a specific responsibility by an authority. Be mindful of the context to ensure it aligns with the formal nature of the phrase.

Common error

Avoid using "charged with the" in informal contexts where simpler phrases like "tasked with" or "assigned to" would be more appropriate. "Charged with the" carries a weight of authority and legal implication that isn't suitable for everyday tasks.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "charged with the" functions primarily as a verbal phrase indicating responsibility or accusation. It connects a subject to a specific duty, task, or legal charge. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is commonly used to denote the assignment of a responsibility or a formal accusation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

23%

Encyclopedias

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

4%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "charged with the" is a versatile phrase primarily used to indicate that someone has been given a formal responsibility or accused of something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in news, science and encyclopedia contexts. When using this phrase, consider its formal tone and avoid using it in informal settings where simpler alternatives like "tasked with" or "assigned to" might be more appropriate. Remember that the phrase should be followed by the specific duty or crime. The frequency of the expression is very common, suggesting its prevalence across various authoritative sources, like The New York Times and The Guardian.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

accused of

Indicates a formal accusation of wrongdoing, similar to being "charged with", but focuses on the accusation itself.

indicted for

Specifically refers to being formally accused of a crime by a grand jury.

tasked with

Implies being assigned a specific duty or task, sharing the sense of responsibility but without the legal implications.

impeached for

Specifically refers to being accused of serious misconduct, often in a political context.

entrusted with

Highlights the aspect of trust and delegation of responsibility.

assigned to

Suggests a formal assignment of a task or duty, similar to "tasked with".

responsible for

Indicates accountability for something, broader than a specific charge or task.

held accountable for

Emphasizes the aspect of being answerable for actions or outcomes.

given the duty of

More explicitly states the act of assigning a duty.

bearing the onus of

Highlights the burden of responsibility.

FAQs

How to use "charged with the" in a sentence?

Use "charged with the" to indicate someone has been formally accused of something, such as a crime, or given a specific, often important, responsibility. For example, "He was "charged with the" murder" or "She was "charged with the" task of leading the team".

What can I say instead of "charged with the"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "tasked with", "assigned to", "responsible for", or "accused of". The best choice depends on whether you're emphasizing duty, assignment, or accusation.

Which is correct, "charged with the" or "charged of the"?

"Charged with the" is the correct and standard usage. "Charged of the" is grammatically incorrect. Always use the preposition "with" in this context.

What's the difference between "charged with the task" and "tasked with the task"?

"Charged with the task" implies a formal assignment or responsibility, often by an authority, whereas "tasked with" the task simply means someone has been given that task. "Charged with the task" is more formal and implies greater importance.