chargeable to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "chargeable to" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it in contexts where you want to indicate that a cost or expense is attributed to a specific account or individual. Example: "The expenses incurred during the trip are chargeable to the marketing budget." Alternative expressions include "attributable to" and "assigned to."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

The problem of mistake becomes more intractable when the error is chargeable to only one party.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In either case, his act would be equally chargeable to his codefendants.

Cornell University

7. General clerical and stenographic work except that chargeable to Account 586, Meter Expenses.

Cornell University

Recoverable cost is a loan cost expense chargeable to either a borrower or property account.

Cornell University

A federal district court ruled that some, but not all, of the union expenditures were constitutionally chargeable to the plaintiffs.

Britannica

Include also credits for steam expenses chargeable to other electric accounts outside of the steam generation group.

Cornell University

The cost of the first setting and testing of a meter is chargeable to utility plant, Account 370, Meters.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

In addition, call attempts to MSDCs outside of the vote open period, or to numbers no longer in use, are non-chargeable to callers, unlike text where charges may still apply.

BBC

I cannot list all the eligible countries here, but some notable ones are: Syria - Persons born in the areas administered prior to June 1967 by Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt are chargeable, respectively, to Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt.

Forbes

In order to ensure proper accounting and distribution of agency shop fees in the future, then, the court emphasized that unions in agency shops bear the burden of proving the proportion of chargeable expenses to total expenses for purposes of determining the amount the union may charge nonunion employees for services.

Britannica

The charge composition (mixing ratio) of C3Ms may be defined by the ratio (f-) of the number of negatively chargeable groups to the total number of (negatively and positively) chargeable groups.

Colloid and Polymer Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "chargeable to", ensure the context clearly identifies what is being charged and to whom or what it is being charged. Clarity prevents ambiguity in financial or legal contexts.

Common error

Avoid assuming all costs are automatically "chargeable to" a particular account. Verify that the expense aligns with the account's designated purpose and budget before allocation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "chargeable to" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase used to specify where a cost, expense, or responsibility should be allocated. Ludwig AI confirms its common use in various contexts, indicating proper grammatical function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

40%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "chargeable to" is a very common and grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to indicate the allocation of a cost or expense to a specific entity or account. Ludwig AI confirms that the expression is widely used in academic, news, and formal business settings. While alternative phrases like "attributable to" or "assignable to" exist, the best choice depends on the specific context. When using "chargeable to", ensure clarity in specifying what is being charged and to whom. Avoid assuming automatic chargeability without verifying alignment with budget and purpose. This ensures accurate financial management and clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

attributable to

Emphasizes a causal relationship or connection between something and a cause or origin.

attributed to

Suggests that something is believed to be caused by or associated with a particular person or thing.

assignable to

Highlights the act of designating or allocating something to a specific entity or purpose.

ascribable to

Implies that something can be attributed or credited to a particular source or cause.

imputable to

Formally suggests responsibility or blame can be assigned to someone or something.

traceable to

Suggests that something can be followed back to its origin or cause.

levied on

Specifically refers to the imposition of a tax, fee, or other charge on something.

billable to

Indicates that an amount can be invoiced or charged to a client or customer.

debitable to

Focuses on the financial aspect of recording a charge against an account.

creditable to

Implies that someone or something is deserving of recognition or merit for a particular achievement.

FAQs

How can I use "chargeable to" in a sentence?

You can use "chargeable to" to indicate that a cost or expense should be allocated to a specific account or person. For example, "The cost of the repairs is "chargeable to" the maintenance budget."

What are some alternatives to "chargeable to"?

Alternatives to "chargeable to" include "attributable to", "assignable to", or "billable to", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "chargeable on" instead of "chargeable to"?

While "chargeable on" might be grammatically acceptable in some contexts, "chargeable to" is the more common and widely understood phrasing when referring to allocating costs or expenses. Consider using "levied on" when referring to the imposition of a tax or fee.

What is the difference between "chargeable to" and "attributed to"?

"Chargeable to" specifically implies a financial or accounting allocation, whereas "attributed to" is a broader term suggesting a causal relationship or association. The cost is "chargeable to" the marketing department, whereas the success of the campaign is "attributed to" the team's hard work.