charge to

USAGE SUMMARY

"charge to" is correct and usable in written English.
"Charge to" typically refers to the act of attributing an expense to a particular person or entity. For example, "I charged the restaurant bill to my company credit card."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There's no charge to those donating.

The Guardian

There was no charge to sign up.

The New York Times

There is no charge to move.

The Guardian - Money

There is no charge to families.

The New York Times

There is no charge to board.

The New York Times

It is an easy charge to make.

The Guardian - Business

It was Cook who instigated England's charge to victory.

Independent

However, they do charge to attend exhibition games.

The New York Times

Dabhol's fixed charge to MSEB will therefore soar.

The Economist

You just can't charge to see an M.M.A. match".

The New York Times - Sports

The failed artillery bombardment doomed Picket's Charge to futile glory.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "charge to", ensure the context clearly indicates whether you are referring to assigning financial responsibility, attributing blame, or adding an electrical charge. Clarity is key.

Common error

Avoid using "charge to" interchangeably with phrases like "attribute to" or "assign to" without considering the specific context. "Charge to" often implies a financial aspect, while the others may not.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "charge to" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of assigning a cost or responsibility to someone or something. Ludwig AI confirms that it's correct and usable in written English. Examples from Ludwig show its use in attributing expenses, as well as adding electrical charge.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "charge to" is a versatile expression with primary functions related to assigning costs or responsibilities. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in English. Its usage spans across varied contexts from financial transactions to scientific descriptions. While the phrase is grammatically sound, it's important to be aware of the context to avoid misinterpretations. The examples from Ludwig show its application in attributing expenses, assigning responsibilities, and even detailing electrical effects. Ludwig examples demonstrate the phrase's presence in reputable sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Forbes, further establishing its credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

debit to

Specifically refers to deducting an amount from an account, narrower than the general usage of "charge to".

attribute to

Focuses on assigning responsibility or cause, differing from the financial implication of "charge to".

bill to

Similar to invoice but can also refer to smaller transactions, less formal.

invoice to

Relates to the process of billing, a more formal and commercial context.

assign to

Implies allocation or delegation, rather than financial transaction or responsibility.

assess to

Refers to evaluating or determining an amount, usually in taxation or levies.

impute to

Suggests ascribing something, often a fault or motive, which is different from assigning a financial cost.

ascribe to

Implies attributing a quality or characteristic, not necessarily a financial or transactional context.

account for

Focuses on providing a reason or explanation, varying from direct assignment.

hold accountable to

Emphasizes responsibility and accountability, rather than financial allocation.

FAQs

How can I use "charge to" in a sentence?

You can use "charge to" to indicate who is responsible for a cost, as in "I will "charge the meal to" my company account". It can also mean to add a charge, as in "Adding "charge to" a loop biases towards a cytoplasmic position".

What's the difference between "charge to" and "attribute to"?

"Charge to" often implies a financial responsibility or cost assignment. "Attribute to", on the other hand, suggests assigning a cause, quality, or characteristic. For example, "I will "charge the expense to" my department" versus "I "attribute the success to" their hard work".

What are some alternatives to "charge to" when referring to billing?

If you're talking about billing someone, you could use alternatives like "bill to", "invoice to", or "debit to" depending on the specific context and formality.

Is there a difference between "charge to" and "free of charge to"?

Yes, "charge to" means someone will be billed or held financially responsible, while "free of "charge to"" means there is no cost involved for the person or entity receiving the service or item.