characterized as valid

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "characterized as valid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing something that has been identified or defined as valid in a specific context or analysis. Example: "The results of the study were characterized as valid due to the rigorous methodology employed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It would also be wrong to call it true or false, though it can be characterized as valid or invalid, in appropriate senses of these ambiguous words.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Informal fallacies are not characterized as resembling formally valid arguments; they gain their allure some other way.

SEP

In addition valid results were obtained only when the schistosome infection status was characterized as simply infected or not infected (see S3 in Additional File 1 for further details).

BMC Infectious Diseases

Such ovaries are characterized as lacunate.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He is often characterized as a deconstructivist.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Can this be characterized as a tax?

The New York Times

Indeed, neither could be characterized as shy.

The New York Times

Even the Apostles are characterized as healers.

Encyclopedia Britannica

We've always been characterized as terrorists.

The New York Times

"I was characterized as being for sale".

The New York Times

Thus, properties can be characterized as predicables.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "characterized as valid", ensure that the characterizing entity and the criteria for validity are clear to the reader. Providing context enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "characterized as valid" without specifying the context or criteria for validity. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "characterized as valid" functions as a descriptive term, indicating that something has been identified and defined as meeting certain criteria or standards of validity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in English. It's often used to add a layer of assessment or judgment to a subject.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "characterized as valid" is a grammatically sound and useful phrase for indicating that something has been assessed and found to meet specific criteria for validity. As Ludwig AI points out, this expression is accurate and applicable in English writing. Though its frequency is only uncommon, it finds its strongest presence in scientific, news, and encyclopedia domains. To use it effectively, ensure the context and the criteria defining validity are clear to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "deemed legitimate" or "regarded as sound" can offer nuanced variations in meaning. When writing with the phrase, avoid overgeneralization and clearly specify who is doing the characterizing and why it is considered valid.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

classified as valid

Focuses on the systematic categorization of something as valid.

deemed legitimate

Focuses on the legitimacy or authorization aspect rather than characterization.

identified as legitimate

Highlights the act of recognition or confirmation of legitimacy.

regarded as sound

Emphasizes the reliability and reasonableness of the subject.

recognized as sound

Emphasizes the acknowledged quality of being reliable or well-founded.

validated as correct

Highlights that something has been confirmed or proven to be correct.

considered authentic

Highlights the genuineness and lack of falsification of the subject.

assessed as accurate

Emphasizes the evaluation of something's correctness or precision.

viewed as acceptable

Focuses on whether something meets the required standards or criteria.

qualified as acceptable

Highlights that something has met the necessary qualifications to be acceptable.

FAQs

How can I use "characterized as valid" in a sentence?

You can use "characterized as valid" to describe something that has been identified or defined as valid in a specific context. For instance, "The research methodology was "characterized as valid" by the review board because of its rigorous design".

What are some alternatives to "characterized as valid"?

Alternatives include "deemed legitimate", "regarded as sound", or "considered authentic", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "characterized as valid" in formal writing?

Yes, "characterized as valid" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in academic or professional contexts where precise language is important. However, ensure the context and criteria for validity are clearly defined.

What does it mean for something to be "characterized as valid"?

When something is "characterized as valid", it means that it has been identified and described as meeting certain criteria or standards for validity within a specific context. The term is frequently used to describe research methodologies, arguments, or results.