changes recognized by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "changes recognized by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing modifications or alterations that have been acknowledged or accepted by a particular entity or group. Example: "The changes recognized by the committee will be implemented in the next phase of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In whole venom, disintegrins which have not been proteolytically processed could potentially assist in the targeting of PII snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs) to specific integrin receptors in cell membranes [ 37], giving rise to chemical changes recognized by the snakes.

BMC Biology

All samples homozygous for MUTYH sequence changes recognized by SSCP analysis (c.64G > A, c.536A > G, c.1187G > A, c.1227_12289dupGG and c.1437_1439delGGA) could be reproducibly distinguished from the wild-type counterparts by a temperature shift in the melting curve.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Apoptotic cells exhibit surface changes that distinguish them from viable cells, and these changes were recognized by efferocytic receptors including CD36 molecule (CD36), CD14 molecule (CD14), and Stabilin-1/2 (STAB1:STAB2).

F1000Research

Age-related changes are recognized by a decline in the stemness potential that result in reduced regeneration potential of the skeleton.

BMC Genomics

Such change was recognized by Indian grammarians; e.g., Patañjali noted that perfect forms of the type ca-kr-a 'you did' (2nd person plural) were not in use at his time; instead, a nominal (participial adjective) form with a complex suffix-tavat was used e.g., kṛ-tavant-as (nom. l. masc).. Indian grammarians also recognized the existence of different dialects.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A few years passed before the ramifications of the change were recognized by financial planners and advisors such as Lawrence Kotlikoff of Boston University.

Los Angeles Times

These findings by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were recognized by the national science academies of all major industrialized nations in a joint statement in 2010.

Huffington Post

These changes have been recognized by one of Canada's most visibleenvironmental non-governmental organizations (ENGO), the David Suzuki Foundation,that Ontario's green energy policies are the most far reaching in North America interms of clean energy, innovation and jobs [3].

Energy, Sustainability and Society

The method is based on the idea that recognition sites may correspond to localized regions with low-intensity energetic couplings with the rest of the protein, which allows them to undergo conformational changes, to be recognized by a binding partner, and to tolerate mutations with minimal energetic expense.

Biophysical Journal

The method is based on the rationale that interaction sites are generally characterized by non-optimized intramolecular interaction networks, so that they may undergo conformational changes and be recognized by a binding partner with minimal energetic expense.

Plosone

Liver changes were first recognized by Hagander et al. [ 41], and later, these findings were confirmed in several studies in which abnormal liver enzyme tests were detected in over 20% of cases [ 41– 41].

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "changes recognized by", ensure that the entity doing the recognizing is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The changes recognized by the committee were significant" is clearer than "The changes recognized were significant".

Common error

Avoid using "changes recognized by" in vague contexts where the 'recognizer' is unclear. This can lead to confusion about whose perspective or criteria are being applied. Instead, explicitly state who or what is recognizing the changes.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "changes recognized by" functions as a noun phrase modifier, indicating alterations or modifications that have been acknowledged or validated by a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, with examples showcasing its application in various contexts, such as scientific research and policy changes.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "changes recognized by" is used to indicate that certain alterations or modifications have been acknowledged by a specific entity. Ludwig AI states that the phrase is correct and usable in written English, although its frequency is rare. It is commonly found in science, news media, and encyclopedia contexts. To enhance clarity, it's essential to specify who or what is recognizing the changes. Alternatives include "alterations acknowledged by" or "modifications identified by". This phrase often implies significance or impact associated with the acknowledged changes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

alterations acknowledged by

This alternative replaces "changes" with "alterations" and "recognized" with "acknowledged", focusing on the acceptance of modifications.

modifications identified by

This alternative uses "modifications" instead of "changes" and "identified" instead of "recognized", emphasizing the discovery of alterations.

variations noticed by

This alternative uses "variations" instead of "changes" and "noticed" instead of "recognized", highlighting the observation of differences.

shifts perceived by

This alternative substitutes "changes" with "shifts" and "recognized" with "perceived", emphasizing the awareness of transitions.

revisions approved by

This alternative focuses on formal acceptance, using "revisions" for "changes" and "approved" for "recognized".

adjustments understood by

This alternative replaces "changes" with "adjustments" and "recognized" with "understood", indicating comprehension of the alterations.

developments observed by

This alternative uses "developments" instead of "changes" and "observed" instead of "recognized", emphasizing the witnessing of progressions.

transformations detected by

This alternative uses "transformations" instead of "changes" and "detected" instead of "recognized", highlighting the discovery of fundamental alterations.

evolutions noted by

This alternative uses "evolutions" instead of "changes" and "noted" instead of "recognized", emphasizing the recording of gradual developments.

mutations registered by

This alternative uses "mutations" instead of "changes" and "registered" instead of "recognized", highlighting the formal recording of alterations.

FAQs

How can I use "changes recognized by" in a sentence?

Use "changes recognized by" to indicate that certain alterations or modifications have been acknowledged by a specific entity. For example, "The "changes recognized by" the scientific community were groundbreaking."

What are some alternatives to saying "changes recognized by"?

You can use alternatives like "alterations acknowledged by", "modifications identified by", or "revisions approved by" depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "changes recognized by" and "changes identified by"?

"Changes recognized by" implies acknowledgment or acceptance, while "changes identified by" simply means that the changes were discovered or noticed. The former carries a connotation of validation or agreement.

Which is more formal, "changes recognized by" or "changes noticed by"?

"Changes recognized by" tends to be more formal, suggesting a formal or official acknowledgement. "Changes noticed by" is more informal and implies a simple observation.