challenge conventions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'challenge conventions' is correct and can be used in written English.
It means to go against traditional norms or expectations and question or oppose established beliefs or practices. Example: The artist's avant-garde style challenged conventions and sparked a debate in the art world. In this example, 'challenged conventions' means that the artist's work deviated from traditional or mainstream art styles and caused controversy or discussion because of its unconventional nature.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

A death cafe allows participants to challenge conventions.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Change perceptions, challenge conventions, but do it on our terms.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The phrase summed up his determination to challenge conventions in overseas aid.

The Guardian

Both stories have at their core powerful coming-of-age narratives, which challenge conventions of historical time and gender roles.

The New Yorker

He set himself to challenge conventions and taboos that led to "the starving of the human heart".

The Guardian - Books

We want to fill our seats with students who have things to say, who will challenge conventions and advance conversations, who will learn from each other.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

What the museums all had, however, was an eagerness to challenge convention.

The New York Times

They dared to challenge convention and believed in the spirit of fairness, cooperation and people power.

The Guardian - Opinion

In her political career, this willingness to challenge convention has helped Ms. Merkel, the head of the Christian Democrats, break ideological molds.

The New York Times

Just as Mr. Wilson reimagines the "with strings" format, transforming the onstage assemblage into something of an octet, so do the smaller groups challenge convention.

The New York Times

"Look for a course that will make you think rigorously, research, explore, challenge convention - and develop conceptual work with a practical emphasis and social relevance".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "challenge conventions", ensure that the context clearly indicates which specific conventions are being questioned or opposed. For example, specify "challenge conventions in the workplace" or "challenge conventions in art".

Common error

Avoid using "challenge conventions" in a generic way without specifying the conventions being challenged. This can lead to unclear and unconvincing arguments. Be specific.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "challenge conventions" functions as a verb phrase where "challenge" is the verb and "conventions" is the direct object. Ludwig's examples indicate that it is used to describe the act of questioning or opposing established norms.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "challenge conventions" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that describes the act of questioning or opposing established norms. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and appropriate for use in written English. The phrase appears frequently in news and media, formal business, and scientific contexts. When using "challenge conventions", ensure that the specific conventions being challenged are clearly identified to avoid vagueness. Alternatives include "question norms" and "defy expectations". The phrase's purpose is to express a critical stance towards the status quo and advocate for change or re-evaluation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

question norms

This alternative emphasizes the act of questioning existing standards rather than actively opposing them. The semantic similarity is very high.

defy expectations

This phrase highlights the act of not conforming to what is typically expected. It's focused on outcomes rather than the act of challenging.

rebel against traditions

This option suggests a more active and potentially disruptive opposition to established traditions. Semantic similarity is high.

disrupt established practices

This phrase emphasizes the act of interrupting or changing existing practices, often in a business or organizational context. Semantic similarity is moderate.

break the mold

This idiom suggests doing something differently than what is traditionally done. It is often used in creative contexts. Semantic similarity is considerable.

subvert the status quo

This phrase suggests an attempt to undermine or overthrow the existing power structure or social order. Semantic similarity is considerable.

go against the grain

This idiom signifies acting or thinking in opposition to what is generally accepted or expected. Semantic similarity is considerable.

question orthodoxy

This option focuses on questioning established or traditional beliefs, especially in religion or politics. Semantic similarity is moderate.

push boundaries

This phrase indicates an effort to extend or test the limits of what is acceptable or possible. Semantic similarity is moderate.

transcend limitations

This option implies overcoming or rising above existing limitations or constraints. Semantic similarity is low.

FAQs

How can I use "challenge conventions" in a sentence?

You can use "challenge conventions" to describe actions that go against established norms. For example, "The artist's work sought to "challenge conventions" within the art world".

What is a good alternative to "challenge conventions"?

Depending on the context, you might use phrases like "question norms", "defy expectations", or "rebel against traditions".

What does it mean to "challenge conventions"?

To "challenge conventions" means to question or oppose established norms, beliefs, or practices. It implies a critical evaluation and potential rejection of what is traditionally accepted.

Is it always appropriate to "challenge conventions"?

Whether it's appropriate to "challenge conventions" depends on the context and the specific conventions in question. It can be a positive force for progress, but it's important to consider the potential consequences and ethical implications.