cell count was

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cell count was" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or medical contexts when discussing the number of cells in a sample or population. Example: "The cell count was significantly higher in the treated group compared to the control group."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Her white blood cell count was low.

The New York Times - Sports

His red blood cell count was still low.

The New York Times - Sports

The speedskater's white blood cell count was normal.

The New York Times - Sports

His red blood cell count was slipping to worrisome levels.

The New York Times - Sports

(A) Total BAL cell count was performed using a hemocytometer.

Nature

His white blood cell count was normal, and he wasn't coughing up sputum.

The New York Times

The absolute cell count was determined according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer.

Nature

His white blood cell count was 10.7.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Complete blood cell count was unremarkable.

Surgical Case Reports

His white blood cell count was 16.6 × 103 cells.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

The relationship between control of viral replication and CD4) T cell count was examined.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In scientific writing, provide context for the cell count. Compare it to a normal range or a control group to highlight its significance.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by specifying which type of cell you're counting (e.g., white blood cells, CD4+ T cells). Using only "cell count" can be confusing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cell count was" primarily functions as a statement of a measured value, typically within a scientific or medical context. It connects a subject (the cell count) with a state of being (a specific numerical value). Ludwig AI confirms the usability and correctness of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

15%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cell count was" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, especially within scientific and medical fields, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Its primary function is to report a specific cell count, providing factual information in an objective manner. While the register leans toward formal and scientific, the phrase maintains a neutral tone. Common usage patterns reveal its prevalence in science, news & media and academic contexts. When using this phrase, specifying the cell type and units of measurement are crucial for clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the cell count registered

Replaces "was" with a more active verb, "registered", indicating the cell count as a recorded value.

cell enumeration revealed

Uses "enumeration" to emphasize the counting process, and "revealed" to highlight the result.

the cell concentration measured

Focuses on "concentration" rather than just count, implying a density.

cell population was found to be

Emphasizes the "population" aspect and adds detail about the finding.

the cellular quantification indicated

Replaces "count" with "quantification" and "was" with "indicated", adding a layer of formality.

cell number stood at

Emphasizes the final number, using "stood at" to indicate a specific value.

the cell density amounted to

Highlights density instead of count, with "amounted to" specifying the value.

cells were totaled at

Shifts the focus to the cells being counted, using a passive voice.

the absolute cell number reached

Specifies "absolute" number and uses "reached" to suggest a process of accumulation.

total cells tallied

Uses a more concise phrasing, emphasizing the final tally of the cells.

FAQs

How do I use "cell count was" in a sentence?

You can use "cell count was" to report the results of a cell count measurement, for example, "The white blood "cell count was" elevated, indicating a possible infection".

What are some alternatives to saying "cell count was"?

Alternatives include "the "cell count" registered", "cell enumeration revealed", or "the "cellular quantification" indicated", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "cell count was" or "the number of cells was"?

"Cell count was" is more concise and commonly used in scientific and medical contexts. "The number of cells was" is grammatically correct but less frequently used in these fields.

What does it mean when a "cell count was" outside the normal range?

An abnormal "cell count" can indicate various conditions, such as infection, inflammation, or immune system disorders. Further investigation is usually needed to determine the cause.