causing losses for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "causing losses for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the negative impact or financial detriment that an action or event has on an individual, organization, or entity. Example: "The recent market fluctuations are causing losses for many investors who had heavily invested in stocks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Top South Korean economic officials, including Jin Nyum, the Finance and Economy Minister, later publicly apologized for shifting policy and causing losses for minority shareholders of the banks, but defended the new move.

The New York Times

The stocks then plunged back to earth, causing losses for unwary investors in what the S.E.C. called an updated version of the classic market manipulation known as a pump and dump.

The New York Times

If Waldfogel's findings are correct, Web video could gain viewers without causing losses for content creators.

Forbes

The traders are alleged to have manipulated power prices to make money with their financial swap positions, causing losses for rival power traders of $139m and winning the bank $34.9m.

BBC

As more borrowers fell behind or went into foreclosure, the value of securities backed by their loans fell, causing losses for investors.

Huffington Post

By forcing Reid's stockbrokers to dump the stock back on the market, this maneuver would depress the stock price, causing losses for the brokerage firms but allowing Reid's people to buy back in at a bargain price, ride the stock up, and sell out at a profit.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Severe Fir Broom Rust can cause losses for growers.

Cornell University

It was one of several bad loans that caused losses for holders of the old bonds.

The New York Times

The merger costs had also caused losses for Time Warner in the final two quarters of 1989 and for the year.

The New York Times

The park's reputation has been tainted by the four-month shutdown, which caused losses for the South Korean companies with assembly lines at the complex.

Independent

Director oversight duties are designed to ensure reasonable reporting and information systems exist that would allow directors to know about and prevent wrongdoing that could cause losses for the Company.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "causing losses for", be specific about who or what is experiencing the losses to provide clarity and context. For instance, "the policy change is causing losses for small businesses."

Common error

Ensure that you clearly identify the agent or event that is "causing" the losses; avoid ambiguity by specifying the direct cause-and-effect relationship.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "causing losses for" functions as a verbal phrase that describes the action of inflicting financial harm or detriment on a specified entity. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "causing losses for" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, as supported by Ludwig AI, that describes an action or event leading to financial harm. Its usage is most common in news and media, as well as scientific contexts. While not exceedingly frequent, it effectively conveys the negative impact on an entity, whether an individual, business, or organization. To ensure clarity, specify the entity experiencing the losses. Alternatives like "resulting in losses for" and "leading to losses for" can offer subtle variations in emphasis, depending on whether the focus is on the action or the outcome.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulting in losses for

Focuses on the outcome of an action, emphasizing the consequence of losses.

leading to losses for

Highlights the path or direction an action takes, ultimately causing losses.

generating losses for

Emphasizes the creation or production of losses.

inflicting losses on

Suggests a forceful or deliberate act that results in losses.

imposing losses on

Implies authority or control in the act of causing losses.

precipitating losses for

Highlights the sudden or hastened nature of the losses.

triggering losses for

Focuses on the initiating event that sets off a chain reaction leading to losses.

spurring losses for

Suggests an action that encourages or motivates losses.

effecting losses for

Implies a direct and immediate impact resulting in losses.

bringing about losses for

Focuses on the action that makes losses happen.

FAQs

How can I use "causing losses for" in a sentence?

You can use "causing losses for" to describe an action or event that leads to financial detriments or damages. For example, "The economic downturn is "causing losses for" many investors."

What are some alternatives to "causing losses for"?

Some alternatives include "resulting in losses for", "leading to losses for", or "generating losses for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "cause losses for" or "causing losses for"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "causing losses for" typically implies an ongoing or continuous action, while "cause losses for" is more general. For example, "Poor management can "cause losses for" a company, while ongoing market volatility is "causing losses for" many investors."

What's the difference between "causing losses for" and "resulting in losses for"?

"Causing losses for" emphasizes the direct action that leads to losses, while "resulting in losses for" emphasizes the outcome or consequence. They are often interchangeable, but the choice depends on which aspect you want to highlight.