cause harm for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cause harm for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; a more appropriate phrase would be "cause harm to" or "cause harm for the sake of." Example: "The new policy may cause harm to vulnerable communities."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

The potential manufacture of products that, unless forestalled by law or regulation, could cause harm (for example, drugs, guns, and devices prone to exploding or worse).

The Guardian

But the drugs do cause harm for some even as they confer benefit for others.

Forbes

Concerns apparently included "depersonalisation, or machine learning systems replacing valued human experiences; the potential impact of machine learning on employment; the potential for machine learning systems to cause harm, for example accidents in autonomous vehicles; and machine learning systems restricting choice, such as when directing consumers to specific products and services".

TechCrunch

"The whole idea of overdiagnosis is that, if you go through yearly screening mammography, more cancers would be diagnosed too early". She says there could be a very slow growing cancer that may not cause harm for several years.

HuffPost

He said divulging information about how the U.S. conducts counterterrorism investigations "could cause harm for years to come". Attorneys representing two agents who allegedly acted as Monteilh's "handlers" and their supervisors argued that their clients were prevented from fighting the claims because the information about why and how they conducted their investigation was classified.

Los Angeles Times

Providers may believe that IPs are gifts and do not cause harm for patients and the health system in general.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

It also stirs up hate and causes harm for generations to come.

The Guardian - Opinion

Dr. LaFarge said that while concerns about a pet that shows signs of mourning are normal, dogs and cats do not typically grieve to the point where it causes harm, for example by withdrawing or not eating for long periods of time.

The New York Times

But the incident caused harm, for Briart's disciples continued to snipe at Erasmus.

SEP

Sign up now Theyet the besuggestedE Canada delivered sthatght to your inbox.

Vice

Francis's call for criminal sanctions for those that cause harm and for doctors and managers to have a duty to reveal instances of poor care are necessary steps to make profound change in the NHS.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "cause harm for". Instead, use the correct phrasing: "cause harm to". Always ensure proper grammar in your writing to maintain clarity and credibility.

Common error

A common mistake is using the incorrect preposition after "cause harm". While it might sound correct to some, "cause harm for" is not standard English. Always use "cause harm to" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cause harm for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms that a more appropriate phrase would be "cause harm to". The primary grammatical function of the corrected phrase, "cause harm to", is to express the action of inflicting damage or injury upon someone or something.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cause harm for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI suggests the correct phrasing is "cause harm to". Due to its grammatical issues, it's best to avoid using "cause harm for" in formal writing. Instead, rely on established alternatives like "cause harm to", "inflict harm on", or "do harm to". These alternatives ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy in conveying the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cause harm to

This is the standard and grammatically correct way to express causing harm.

inflict harm on

This alternative emphasizes the act of deliberately causing harm.

do harm to

A more common and widely accepted way of expressing the action of causing damage or injury.

bring harm to

This suggests that harm is being brought upon someone or something.

pose a threat to

This indicates a potential for harm rather than actual harm.

jeopardize

This implies placing someone or something in a situation where harm is likely.

endanger

Similar to jeopardize, but focuses on the risk of physical harm.

be detrimental to

This highlights the damaging or harmful effects on someone or something.

have adverse effects on

A more formal way of expressing that something has negative and harmful consequences.

damage

A direct and simple alternative, focusing on the act of causing damage.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "cause harm for"?

The correct way to phrase it is "cause harm to". For example, "The policy could "cause harm to" the environment" is grammatically sound.

What can I say instead of "cause harm for"?

You can use alternatives like "inflict harm on", "do harm to", or "bring harm to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "cause harm for" or "cause harm to"?

"Cause harm to" is the correct and standard English phrasing. "Cause harm for" is grammatically incorrect.

Is "cause harm for" ever appropriate in a sentence?

While exceedingly rare, "cause harm for" might appear in highly specific, non-standard contexts. However, in the vast majority of situations, "cause harm to" is the correct and preferred phrasing.