caught for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "caught for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey being apprehended or captured for a specific reason, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "He was caught for stealing the car."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Lobsters are caught for export.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Once Cooper's caught for good, so are we.

The New York Times

"These are the things he got caught for," she said.

The New York Times

We ate what we caught for lunch the next day.

The Guardian - Travel

He likened the current cases to being caught for speeding.

The New York Times

He was then caught for the final time.

The Guardian

No one was getting caught for these crimes.

The Guardian - Arts

The second, on a quick slant, was caught for 16 yards.

The New York Times - Sports

Sand eel, mackerel, and sprat are caught for the production of fish meal.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Jeter hit three balls hard earlier in the game, but each was caught for an out.

The New York Times - Sports

And when people are caught for corruption, why are they not punished immediately?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating the reason someone was apprehended, use more precise and grammatically standard phrases like "arrested for", "apprehended for", or "penalized for" instead of "caught for".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "caught for" in formal writing. It is better to replace it with more formal alternatives, maintaining a professional and clear tone. Sticking to standard phrasing enhances clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "caught for" functions as a passive construction indicating the reason for someone's apprehension or the purpose for which something is captured. However, Ludwig AI notes that the expression is not entirely correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

31%

Encyclopedias

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Science

14%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The expression "caught for" is frequently used across various sources, including news media and encyclopedias. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as not entirely correct in standard written English, suggesting that while prevalent, the phrase may not be grammatically ideal. Alternatives like "arrested for" or "apprehended for" are recommended for more formal and precise communication. Despite its common usage, particularly in informal and neutral contexts, writers should consider using more grammatically sound alternatives in formal settings to enhance clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

arrested for

Focuses specifically on legal apprehension, implying official charges.

apprehended for

Similar to "arrested for" but can also apply to non-legal situations.

penalized for

Implies receiving a penalty or punishment for an action.

punished for

Highlights the consequence of an action, specifically punishment.

reprimanded for

Suggests a formal scolding or rebuke for misconduct.

disciplined for

Similar to "reprimanded for", implying a structured correction.

found guilty of

Refers to a legal judgment of responsibility for a crime.

convicted of

Similar to "found guilty of", emphasizing the legal outcome.

held accountable for

Implies taking responsibility for actions and their consequences.

blamed for

Suggests assigning responsibility for a negative outcome.

FAQs

What's a more formal alternative to "caught for"?

In formal contexts, use alternatives like "arrested for", "apprehended for", or "penalized for" to maintain a professional tone.

How can I use "arrested for" instead of "caught for"?

Instead of saying "He was caught for stealing", say "He was arrested for stealing" to be more grammatically correct and precise.

Is "caught for" grammatically correct?

While widely used, "caught for" is considered grammatically "incorrect" in standard written English. It's better to opt for more formal and precise alternatives.

What's the difference between "caught for" and "apprehended for"?

"Caught for" is a colloquial expression, while "apprehended for" is a more formal and standard way to indicate that someone has been officially taken into custody.