categorized results for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "categorized results for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to results that have been organized or classified in a specific way for analysis or presentation. Example: "The categorized results for the survey indicate a clear preference among participants."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The categorized results for these tests retain a quantitative nature (although this is distinct from the quantitative primary data) and, in practice, trueness and precision can be determined at the category level, as well as at the level of the primary result.

European Journal of Human Genetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

have advocated for an external Central Advisory Body which acts in an advisory capacity to assemble a roster of genetic research findings which meet generally accepted criteria for return, allowing for greater consistency and efficiency to categorizing results appropriate for return.

Bioethics

Instead of showing linear, Google-like results, Kosmix is categorizing results to create a taxonomy.

TechCrunch

Table 2 ranks the list of categorized optimization results for the microgrid.

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

The categorized optimization results show that for a primary load of 297 kWh/day, the PV/DG/Battery hybrid system can be considered as the most economical assuming no fluctuation in diesel price.

International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering

Two Nuclear Medicine Physicians, with more than 10 years of experience with choline imaging, independently revised and reinterpreted the 11C choline PET/CT scans and categorized the results as positive or negative for local abnormal uptake in PB and BUJ along midline.

European Journal of Hybrid Imaging

Nine of these cases, perpetrated by five different people, were further categorized as resulting from a general disregard for hospital rules.

BMC Psychiatry

Respondents' preference at CMSQ was treated as a confounder and respondents were categorized accordingly, resulting in CMSQ preference categories for primary care (n = 309), specialist (n = 1508), and undecided (n = 396).

BMC Medical Education

As we have a monocentric study, representativeness of patients might not be given; (4) we used the WOMAC as a preoperative patient characteristic for health state and dysfunction for categorizing QALY results.

BMC Health Services Research

Our study presents the sensitivity and specificity of mammography and breast ultrasound, individually and in combination, using different thresholds for categorizing test results, in a population of consecutive women.

The Breast

We selected these genes for a protein-protein interaction network analysis and categorized the resulting network modules according to their corresponding gene ontologies.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To ensure clarity, clearly state the criteria used for categorization when presenting "categorized results for".

Common error

Avoid using "categorized results for" loosely. Ensure that the categorization is based on well-defined criteria and that each result clearly fits into one and only one category to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "categorized results for" functions as a modifier followed by a prepositional phrase. It describes the state of "results" after a categorization process. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is usable in English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "categorized results for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe findings that have been intentionally organized into groups. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's particularly prevalent in scientific, technical, and formal contexts where structured presentation is crucial. When using this phrase, ensure that the categorization criteria are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "classified outcomes for", "grouped data for", and "sorted findings for", which offer subtle variations in emphasis while maintaining a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

classified outcomes for

Focuses on the act of classifying instead of categorizing, implying a more structured approach.

grouped data for

Emphasizes the arrangement of data into groups, slightly less formal than "categorized".

sorted findings for

Highlights the act of sorting, suggesting an ordered arrangement of results.

organized results for

Similar to categorized, but can imply a more general arrangement.

tabulated results for

Focuses on presenting results in a table format, implying a structured overview.

indexed results for

Implies a more detailed level of organization, often used in data retrieval contexts.

labeled results for

Focuses on assigning labels or tags to the results, making them easier to identify.

structured results for

Suggests a predefined framework or schema applied to the results.

thematic results for

Highlights results organized by theme or topic.

results classified by

Rearranges the phrase structure to emphasize the classification method.

FAQs

How can I use "categorized results for" in a sentence?

You can use "categorized results for" to describe findings that have been organized into distinct groups. For example, "The "categorized results for" the patient survey revealed significant differences in satisfaction levels among various age groups."

What are some alternatives to saying "categorized results for"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as "classified outcomes for", "grouped data for", or "sorted findings for" to convey a similar meaning.

When is it appropriate to use "categorized results for"?

It is appropriate when you want to emphasize that the results have been intentionally organized into categories based on specific criteria, making them easier to analyze or present.

What's the difference between "categorized results for" and "results classified by"?

"Categorized results for" focuses on the results themselves being organized, while "results classified by" emphasizes the method or criteria used to classify those results.