categorized about

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "categorized about" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not typically used in standard English, and it may confuse readers due to its awkward construction. Example: "The data was categorized about various topics, but it lacked clarity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Toshiba categorized about 500,000 Japanese words into fields such as travel and culture, and classified words related to evaluation as good or bad.

TechCrunch

Euclidian straight-line distance to the nearest rural health center categorized about the mean was not significantly associated with ownership of an ITN at the 5% level; 24% of households 2.5 km or closer to a rural health center had no ITN compared to 29% of households further than 2.5 km from a rural health center (χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.089).

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Using this combined approach, we were able to categorize about 82% of the annotated markers in our FDR<0.05 according to a subset of descriptive cellular functions and pathways (Tables 2 7).

Plosone

Despite the fact that F508del-CFTR is the main target for drug development in CF (Becq et al., 2011), categorizing about 2000 individual mutations identified so far in patients worldwide would be a tough job while still remaining an important challenge.

EBioMedicine

If he had brought him on and then had him assassinated, the movie would inevitably have been categorized as "about" political assassination, and the real subject, the haphazard and human interactions of a community, would have been missed.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Today, Diffbot has categorized the web into about 20 different page types, including homepages and article pages, which are the first two types it can now identity.

TechCrunch

Green Bay Packers General Manager Ted Thompson categorized innocuous questions about free agents as "some sort of hypothetical," far outside the realm of speculation.

The New York Times

A respondent was categorized as knowledgeable about RVF if he/she obtained a score of 5 or more out of 9 (55 % cut-off point).

BMC Infectious Diseases

The total number of participants answering each question varied from n = 241-245 for women with BMI < 25.0 and n = 97-107 for women with BMI ≥ 25.0 Two hundred and thirty-five women (57% of the total cohort independent of pre pregnancy BMI) were categorized as knowing about the risks of being obese on pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

The number of convections in each cloudy disturbance in Δ0.87 is about 104, while those categorized as "other" is about 105, which is similar to the global accumulation.

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

To investigate which kinds of genes were likely to use alternative first exons and what biological consequences AFEs could bring about, we first categorized AFE-containing clusters in rice and Arabidopsis according to the Gene Ontology classification.

BMC Plant Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "categorized about" in formal writing. Instead, use "categorized by" or "classified according to" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

A common mistake is using "about" after "categorized". The correct preposition is usually "by" to indicate the criteria used for categorization. For instance, say "The books were categorized by genre" rather than "categorized about genre".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "categorized about" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition. However, it is grammatically incorrect as confirmed by Ludwig AI, where the correct preposition should typically be "by" or another appropriate preposition depending on the context.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "categorized about" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms its incorrectness, advising the use of "categorized by" or "classified according to" instead. Although it appears across various contexts, including science and news media, its usage should be avoided in formal writing. To ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy, it's best to opt for more conventional alternatives when expressing the act of classifying or grouping items.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorized by

Replaces 'about' with 'by' to indicate the criteria used for categorization, resulting in a grammatically correct structure.

classified according to

Uses 'classified' instead of 'categorized' and 'according to' to specify the classification criteria, providing a more formal tone.

grouped by

Employs 'grouped' to convey a similar meaning of arranging items based on shared characteristics, replacing 'categorized'.

sorted into

Utilizes 'sorted' to indicate the action of arranging items into specific categories, offering a more general alternative.

divided into

Uses 'divided' to express the separation of items into distinct groups, changing the verb but maintaining a similar concept.

organized by

Replaces 'categorized' with 'organized' to focus on the arrangement aspect, using 'by' to indicate the organizing principle.

arranged in terms of

Employs 'arranged' with 'in terms of' to describe the arrangement based on certain criteria, providing a more descriptive phrase.

classified under

Uses 'classified' with 'under' to indicate the assignment of items to specific categories, offering a slight variation in preposition.

assigned to categories of

Replaces 'categorized' with 'assigned' to emphasize the act of assigning items to predefined categories.

placed within groups defined by

Utilizes 'placed' to express the act of positioning items into groups, adding 'defined by' to specify the defining criteria.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound way to say "categorized about"?

Instead of "categorized about", use phrases like "categorized by" or "classified according to". These alternatives clearly indicate the criteria for categorization.

How does "categorized by" differ from "categorized about"?

"Categorized by" is grammatically correct and indicates the criteria used for categorization. "Categorized about", however, is not standard English and should be avoided. It doesn't clearly express the relationship between the items and their categories.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "categorized by"?

"Categorized by" is appropriate in any context where you need to specify the criteria used to group items, whether it's in scientific research, data analysis, or general writing. It's a versatile and clear phrase.

Are there any synonyms for "categorized by" that I can use?

Yes, you can use synonyms such as "classified by", "grouped by", or "sorted by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. All of these are grammatically correct and widely accepted.