grouped by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grouped by" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used in contexts where items of a particular type have been organized or classified according to a set of criteria. For example: "The museum's artifacts were grouped by era".

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Sequences were grouped by genus and sub-grouped by sequenced loci.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Boys are grouped by age and ability.

The New York Times

Should items be grouped by a particular theme?

The New York Times

Leagues are forming, with racers grouped by age and ability.

The New York Times

Children will no longer be grouped by age.

The New York Times

The 230 students are grouped by ages rather than grade.

The New York Times

But having them grouped by year is workable enough.

The New York Times - Tech

Newspapers are grouped by region.

Forbes

Devices were grouped by generation.

Science Magazine

Organized and grouped by categories.

TechCrunch

News is often grouped by time.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grouped by", ensure the criteria for grouping is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "grouped by" without specifying the attribute or characteristic used for grouping, as it can lead to confusion. For example, instead of saying "The data was grouped", specify "The data was grouped by age" or "The data was grouped by region".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grouped by" functions as a passive construction indicating categorization based on a specific attribute. As Ludwig AI explains, it signifies that items have been organized according to a shared characteristic, such as "grouped by age" or "grouped by region".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "grouped by" is a versatile and commonly used construction to indicate categorization based on specific criteria. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and applicable in diverse contexts such as science, news, and formal writing. When using "grouped by", it's crucial to specify the grouping criteria for clarity. Alternative phrases include "categorized by" and "organized by", which can be used depending on the context. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "grouped by" to enhance the clarity and structure of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorized by

This alternative suggests a more formal or structured classification process.

classified by

Similar to categorized by, but often implies a more scientific or systematic approach.

organized by

This alternative highlights the act of arranging elements in a structured manner.

arranged by

This suggests a specific order or sequence within the grouping.

sorted by

Implies a specific criterion used to put items into a particular order.

divided by

This alternative emphasizes the act of separating items into distinct groups.

separated by

This suggests a clear distinction between the different groups.

segmented by

Implies dividing a larger group into smaller, more manageable segments.

structured by

This alternative emphasizes the presence of a framework or system guiding the grouping.

sectioned by

Suggests the creation of distinct sections based on a defined criteria.

FAQs

How to use "grouped by" in a sentence?

Use "grouped by" to indicate how items are categorized, for example: "The students were "grouped by age"" or "The products are "grouped by category"".

What can I say instead of "grouped by"?

Alternatives include "categorized by", "classified by", or "organized by", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "grouped by" or "grouped according to"?

"Grouped by" is generally more concise and commonly used. "Grouped according to" is also correct but can sound more formal. Both are acceptable depending on the desired tone.

What's the difference between "grouped by" and "sorted by"?

"Grouped by" implies placing items into distinct categories based on shared characteristics, while "sorted by" suggests arranging items in a specific order based on a particular criterion. For example, items can be "grouped by color" but "sorted by size".